ArticleProgress in biophysics and molecular biology2018
Reproducible model development in the cardiac electrophysiology Web Lab.
Article in Progress in biophysics and molecular biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dataset of in vitro measured chemicals neurotoxicity.Data in brief · 2024Article
- Models of the cardiac L-type calcium current: A quantitative review.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2023Review
- A Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Perspective on the Importance of Parameter Identifiability.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2022Article
- A Parameter Representing Missing Charge Should Be Considered when Calibrating Action Potential Models.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Analysing and simulating energy-based models in biology using BondGraphTools.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2021Article
- Modular assembly of dynamic models in systems biology.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- cellmlmanip and chaste_codegen: automatic CellML to C++ code generation with fixes for singularities and automatically generated Jacobians.Wellcome open research · 2021Article
- Calibration of ionic and cellular cardiac electrophysiology models.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020Review
- An audit of uncertainty in multi-scale cardiac electrophysiology models.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020Review
- Considering discrepancy when calibrating a mechanistic electrophysiology model.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020Article
- Rapid Characterization of hERG Channel Kinetics II: Temperature Dependence.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- A demonstration of modularity, reuse, reproducibility, portability and scalability for modeling and simulation of cardiac electrophysiology using Kepler Workflows.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The modelling of the electrophysiology of cardiac cells is one of the most mature areas of systems biology. This extended concentration of research effort brings with it new challenges, foremost among which is that of choosing which of these models is most suitable for addressing a particular scientific question. In a previous paper, we presented our initial work in developing an online resource for the characterisation and comparison of electrophysiological cell models in a wide range of experimental scenarios. In that work, we described how we had developed a novel protocol language that allowed us to separate the details of the mathematical model (the majority of cardiac cell models take the form of ordinary differential equations) from the experimental protocol being simulated. We developed a fully-open online repository (which we termed the Cardiac Electrophysiology Web Lab) which allows users to store and compare the results of applying the same experimental protocol to competing models. In the current paper we describe the most recent and planned extensions of this work, focused on supporting the process of model building from experimental data. We outline the necessary work to develop a machine-readable language to describe the process of inferring parameters from wet lab datasets, and illustrate our approach through a detailed example of fitting a model of the hERG channel using experimental data. We conclude by discussing the future challenges in making further progress in this domain towards our goal of facilitating a fully reproducible approach to the development of cardiac cell models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.