Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29813153›Full record

SynthesisJAMA pediatrics2018

Association Between Vitamin D Supplementation During Pregnancy and Offspring Growth, Morbidity, and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Wei Guang Bi, Anne Monique Nuyt, Hope Weiler, Line Leduc, Christina Santamaria, Shu Qin Wei

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 205 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wei Guang BiCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint-Justine Research Center, University of Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Anne Monique NuytCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint-Justine Research Center, University of Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Hope WeilerSchool of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Line LeducCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint-Justine Research Center, University of Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Christina SantamariaCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint-Justine Research Center, University of Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Shu Qin WeiCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint-Justine Research Center, University of Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Whether vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy is beneficial and safe for offspring is unclear. Objective: To systematically review studies of the effects of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy on offspring growth, morbidity, and mortality. Data Sources: Searches of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were conducted up to October 31, 2017. Key search terms were vitamin D, pregnancy, randomized controlled trials, and offspring outcomes. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and offspring outcomes. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two authors independently extracted data, and the quality of the studies was assessed. Summary risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD) or mean difference (MD), and 95% CI were calculated using fixed-effects or random-effects meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were fetal or neonatal mortality, small for gestational age (SGA), congenital malformation, admission to a neonatal intensive care unit, birth weight, Apgar scores, neonatal 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) and calcium concentrations, gestational age, preterm birth, infant anthropometry, and respiratory morbidity during childhood. Results: Twenty-four clinical trials involving 5405 participants met inclusion criteria. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy was associated with a lower risk of SGA (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.99; RD, -5.60%; 95% CI, -0.86% to -10.34%) without risk of fetal or neonatal mortality (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.11) or congenital abnormality (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.43). Neonates with prenatal vitamin D supplementation had higher 25(OH)D levels (MD, 13.50 ng/mL; 95% CI, 10.12 to 16.87 ng/mL), calcium levels (MD, 0.19 mg/dL; 95% CI, 0.003 to 0.38 mg/dL), and weight at birth (MD, 75.38 g; 95% CI, 22.88 to 127.88 g), 3 months (MD, 0.21 kg; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.28 kg), 6 months (MD, 0.46 kg; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.58 kg), 9 months (MD, 0.50 kg; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.99 kg), and 12 months (MD, 0.32 kg; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.52 kg). Subgroup analysis by doses showed that low-dose vitamin D supplementation (≤2000 IU/d) was associated with a reduced risk of fetal or neonatal mortality (RR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.80), but higher doses (>2000 IU/d) did not reduce this risk (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.54). Conclusions and Relevance: Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy is associated with a reduced risk of SGA and improved infant growth without risk of fetal or neonatal mortality or congenital abnormality. Vitamin D supplementation with doses of 2000 IU/d or lower during pregnancy may reduce the risk of fetal or neonatal mortality.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsChild DevelopmentCongenital AbnormalitiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFetal DeathGrowthHumansInfantInfant DeathInfant, Small for Gestational AgePregnancyPregnancy OutcomePrenatal CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVitamin DVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID29813153
PMCPMC6137512
OpenAlexW2805066346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.