Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29813147›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2018

Evaluation of Galcanezumab for the Prevention of Episodic Migraine: The EVOLVE-1 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Virginia L Stauffer, David W Dodick, Qi Zhang, Jeffrey N Carter, Jessica Ailani, Robert R Conley

Erratum issued 4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 260 papers, 21 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
260citing papers in PubMed, 21 pooled it
42.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02614183 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of LY2951742 in Patients With Episodic Migraine - the EVOLVE-1 Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2015 to 2018Enrolled862ConditionsMigraineArmsGalcanezumab, Placebo
NCT05232942 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Monoclonal Antibody Duration of REsponse in MIgraine After Treatment Interruption: A Prospective National Study

TypeobservationalSponsorHospital Clínico Universitario de ValladolidRan2022 to 2024Enrolled200ConditionsMigraine, Headache, MigraineArmsHeadache calendar completion
NCT05724771 phase4active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Utilizing CGRPmAb Fremanezumab (Ajovy) in Chronic Migraine Patients Currently on Monotherapy OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox).

TypeinterventionalSponsorChicago Headache Center & Research InstituteRan2023 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsChronic Migraine, HeadacheArmsCombination of Botox + CGRPmAb (Fremanezumab 225mg/1.5mL)
NCT07103694 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Italian Real-life Multicenter Observational Study on Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of Innovative Drugs (Monoclonal Antibodies, Gepants, Ditans, Sumatriptan-naproxen) for Preventive or Acute Migraine Treatment.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIRCCS San Raffaele RomaRan2022 to 2026Enrolled2,641ConditionsEpisodic Migraine, Chronic Migraine, Medication Overuse HeadacheArmsanti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies, gepants, combination of sumatriptan and naproxen, ditan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

260 citing papers in PubMed, 21 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 559 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Headaches in adults in supplementary health: management.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2024
    Guideline
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Guideline
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

200 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Virginia L StaufferEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
David W DodickDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
Qi ZhangEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Jeffrey N CarterEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Jessica AilaniDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
Robert R ConleyEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Eli Lilly (United States) · USGeorgetown University · USMayo Clinic Hospital · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Migraine is a disabling neurological disease characterized by severe headache attacks. Treatment options reduce migraine frequency for many patients, but adverse effects lead to discontinuation in many patients. Objective: To demonstrate that galcanezumab is superior to placebo in the prevention of episodic migraine with or without aura. Design, Setting, and Participants: The EVOLVE-1 (Evaluation of LY2951742 in the Prevention of Episodic Migraine 1) trial was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled (January 11, 2016, to March 22, 2017) trial comparing galcanezumab (120 mg and 240 mg) vs placebo. Patients received treatments once monthly for 6 months (subcutaneous injection via prefilled syringe) and were followed up for 5 months after their last injection. It was a multicenter, clinic-based study involving 90 sites in North America. Participants in the study were adults (aged 18 to 65 years) with at least a 1-year history of migraine, 4 to 14 migraine headache days per month and a mean of at least 2 migraine attacks per month within the past 3 months, and were diagnosed prior to age 50 years. During the study, no other preventive medications were allowed. A total of 1671 patients were assessed; 809 did not meet study entry or baseline criteria, and 858 were included in the intent-to-treat population. Interventions: Patients were randomized (2:1:1) to monthly placebo, galcanezumab, 120 mg, and galcanezumab, 240 mg. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall mean change from baseline in the number of monthly migraine headache days during the treatment period. Secondary measures included at least 50%, at least 75%, and 100% reduction in monthly migraine headache days, migraine headache days with acute medication use, and scores from the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire, Patient Global Impression of Severity, and Migraine Disability Assessment. Treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events were reported. Results: Of the 1671 patients assessed, 858 (mean age, 40.7 years; 718 women [83.7%]) met study entry criteria and received at least 1 dose of investigational product. The primary objective was met for both galcanezumab doses; treatment with galcanezumab significantly reduced monthly migraine headache days (both P < .001) by 4.7 days (120 mg) and 4.6 days (240 mg) compared with placebo (2.8 days). All key secondary objectives were also significant after multiplicity adjustment. There were no meaningful differences between 120-mg and 240-mg doses of galcanezumab on measures of efficacy. Completion rate during treatment was high (81.9%; n = 718), and the incidence of discontinuation owing to adverse events was less than 5% across all treatment groups. Conclusions and Relevance: Galcanezumab 120-mg and 240-mg monthly injections provided clinical benefits and improved functioning. The incidence rate of adverse events was low, demonstrating the favorable tolerability profile of galcanezumab. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02614183.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedgalcanezumab

Identifiers

PMID29813147
PMCPMC6143119
OpenAlexW2805937849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.