Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29813055›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

Parameter uncertainty quantification using surrogate models applied to a spatial model of yeast mating polarization.

Marissa Renardy, Tau-Mu Yi, Dongbin Xiu, Ching-Shan Chou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Global sensitivity analysis of biological multi-scale models.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marissa RenardyDepartment of Mathematics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Tau-Mu YiDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7208-2020
Dongbin XiuDepartment of Mathematics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.
Ching-Shan ChouDepartment of Mathematics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8954-4845

Funding

Bridging the Gap Between Molecular and Mechanical Control of Cell MorphogenesisR01GM113241 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI CAMPAS, OTGER · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM113241NIH HHS GM113241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common challenge in systems biology is quantifying the effects of unknown parameters and estimating parameter values from data. For many systems, this task is computationally intractable due to expensive model evaluations and large numbers of parameters. In this work, we investigate a new method for performing sensitivity analysis and parameter estimation of complex biological models using techniques from uncertainty quantification. The primary advance is a significant improvement in computational efficiency from the replacement of model simulation by evaluation of a polynomial surrogate model. We demonstrate the method on two models of mating in budding yeast: a smaller ODE model of the heterotrimeric G-protein cycle, and a larger spatial model of pheromone-induced cell polarization. A small number of model simulations are used to fit the polynomial surrogates, which are then used to calculate global parameter sensitivities. The surrogate models also allow rapid Bayesian inference of the parameters via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) by eliminating model simulations at each step. Application to the ODE model shows results consistent with published single-point estimates for the model and data, with the added benefit of calculating the correlations between pairs of parameters. On the larger PDE model, the surrogate models allowed convergence for the distribution of 15 parameters, which otherwise would have been computationally prohibitive using simulations at each MCMC step. We inferred parameter distributions that in certain cases peaked at values different from published values, and showed that a wide range of parameters would permit polarization in the model. Strikingly our results suggested different diffusion constants for active versus inactive Cdc42 to achieve good polarization, which is consistent with experimental observations in another yeast species S. pombe.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalModels, StatisticalCell Culture TechniquesCell PolarityDNA-Binding ProteinsHeterotrimeric GTP-Binding ProteinsPeptidesSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsSystems BiologyDNA-Binding ProteinsHeterotrimeric GTP-Binding ProteinsMating Factor, S pombePeptidesSchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29813055
PMCPMC5993324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.