ArticlePLoS computational biology2018
Parameter uncertainty quantification using surrogate models applied to a spatial model of yeast mating polarization.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in surrogate modeling for biological agent-based simulations: trends, challenges, and future prospects.Journal of mathematical biology · 2025Review
- MxlPy-Python package for mechanistic learning and hybrid modelling in life science.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Article
- Spectral expansion methods for prediction uncertainty quantification in systems biology.Frontiers in systems biology · 2024Article
- Efficient parameter generation for constrained models using MCMC.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Bridging the gap between mechanistic biological models and machine learning surrogates.PLoS computational biology · 2023Review
- Bayesian parameter estimation for dynamical models in systems biology.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- To Sobol or not to Sobol? The effects of sampling schemes in systems biology applications.Mathematical biosciences · 2021Article
- An arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian smoothed particle hydrodynamics (ALE-SPH) method with a boundary volume fraction formulation for fluid-structure interaction.Engineering analysis with boundary elements · 2021Article
- Markov chain Monte Carlo with Gaussian processes for fast parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification in a 1D fluid-dynamics model of the pulmonary circulation.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2021Article
- DNN-assisted statistical analysis of a model of local cortical circuits.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Multiscale Modeling of Dyadic Structure-Function Relation in Ventricular Cardiac Myocytes.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- Global sensitivity analysis of biological multi-scale models.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2019Article
- Fast uncertainty quantification for dynamic flux balance analysis using non-smooth polynomial chaos expansions.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A common challenge in systems biology is quantifying the effects of unknown parameters and estimating parameter values from data. For many systems, this task is computationally intractable due to expensive model evaluations and large numbers of parameters. In this work, we investigate a new method for performing sensitivity analysis and parameter estimation of complex biological models using techniques from uncertainty quantification. The primary advance is a significant improvement in computational efficiency from the replacement of model simulation by evaluation of a polynomial surrogate model. We demonstrate the method on two models of mating in budding yeast: a smaller ODE model of the heterotrimeric G-protein cycle, and a larger spatial model of pheromone-induced cell polarization. A small number of model simulations are used to fit the polynomial surrogates, which are then used to calculate global parameter sensitivities. The surrogate models also allow rapid Bayesian inference of the parameters via Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) by eliminating model simulations at each step. Application to the ODE model shows results consistent with published single-point estimates for the model and data, with the added benefit of calculating the correlations between pairs of parameters. On the larger PDE model, the surrogate models allowed convergence for the distribution of 15 parameters, which otherwise would have been computationally prohibitive using simulations at each MCMC step. We inferred parameter distributions that in certain cases peaked at values different from published values, and showed that a wide range of parameters would permit polarization in the model. Strikingly our results suggested different diffusion constants for active versus inactive Cdc42 to achieve good polarization, which is consistent with experimental observations in another yeast species S. pombe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.