Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29813052›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

Can a time varying external drive give rise to apparent criticality in neural systems?

Viola Priesemann, Oren Shriki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Measurement effects on critical scaling in neural systems.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Fluctuating landscapes and heavy tails in animal behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The fractal brain: scale-invariance in structure and dynamics.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Consciousness is supported by near-critical slow cortical electrodynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  18. Addressing skepticism of the critical brain hypothesis.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Viola PriesemannMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8905-5873
Oren ShrikiDepartment of Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1129-4799

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The finding of power law scaling in neural recordings lends support to the hypothesis of critical brain dynamics. However, power laws are not unique to critical systems and can arise from alternative mechanisms. Here, we investigate whether a common time-varying external drive to a set of Poisson units can give rise to neuronal avalanches and exhibit apparent criticality. To this end, we analytically derive the avalanche size and duration distributions, as well as additional measures, first for homogeneous Poisson activity, and then for slowly varying inhomogeneous Poisson activity. We show that homogeneous Poisson activity cannot give rise to power law distributions. Inhomogeneous activity can also not generate perfect power laws, but it can exhibit approximate power laws with cutoffs that are comparable to those typically observed in experiments. The mechanism of generating apparent criticality by time-varying external fields, forces or input may generalize to many other systems like dynamics of swarms, diseases or extinction cascades. Here, we illustrate the analytically derived effects for spike recordings in vivo and discuss approaches to distinguish true from apparent criticality. Ultimately, this requires causal interventions, which allow separating internal system properties from externally imposed ones.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAnimalsBrainElectroencephalographyHaplorhiniHumansMacacaNerve NetNeuronsPoisson DistributionTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29813052
PMCPMC6002119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.