Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29808479›Full record

ArticleBiometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift2019

A nonparametric Bayesian basket trial design.

Yanxun Xu, Peter Müller, Apostolia M Tsimberidou, Donald Berry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Comment: Advancing Clinical Trials with Novel Designs and Implementations.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2023
    Article
  3. Innovative trial design in precision oncology.Seminars in cancer biology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yanxun XuDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5554-8637
Peter MüllerDepartment of Mathematics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78705, USA.
Apostolia M TsimberidouDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77005, USA.
Donald BerryDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77005, USA.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Convalescent Plasma to Limit Coronavirus Associated ComplicationsUL1TR003167 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KARP, DANIEL D, MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2019 to 2023
$45.3M
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
Bayesian models for cancer prognosis by integrating diverse types of dataR01CA132897 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI JI, YUAN, MUELLER, PETER · 2008 to 2019
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003167NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted therapies on the basis of genomic aberrations analysis of the tumor have shown promising results in cancer prognosis and treatment. Regardless of tumor type, trials that match patients to targeted therapies for their particular genomic aberrations have become a mainstream direction of therapeutic management of patients with cancer. Therefore, finding the subpopulation of patients who can most benefit from an aberration-specific targeted therapy across multiple cancer types is important. We propose an adaptive Bayesian clinical trial design for patient allocation and subpopulation identification. We start with a decision theoretic approach, including a utility function and a probability model across all possible subpopulation models. The main features of the proposed design and population finding methods are the use of a flexible nonparametric Bayesian survival regression based on a random covariate-dependent partition of patients, and decisions based on a flexible utility function that reflects the requirement of the clinicians appropriately and realistically, and the adaptive allocation of patients to their superior treatments. Through extensive simulation studies, the new method is demonstrated to achieve desirable operating characteristics and compares favorably against the alternatives.

Indexed as

Statistics, NonparametricBayes TheoremBiometryClinical Trials as TopicHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsbasket trialsBayesian adaptive designssubpopulation identificationtargeted therapies

Identifiers

PMID29808479
PMCPMC6261711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.