Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29808467›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience bulletin2018

Performance of the Autism Spectrum Rating Scale and Social Responsiveness Scale in Identifying Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Cases of Intellectual Disability.

Chunpei Li, Hao Zhou, Tianqi Wang, Shasha Long, Xiaonan Du, Xiu Xu, Weili Yan, Yi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience bulletin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Social Motivation Across Multiple Measures: Caregiver-Report of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chunpei LiDepartment of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 201102, China.
Hao ZhouDepartment of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 201102, China.
Tianqi WangDepartment of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 201102, China.
Shasha LongDepartment of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 201102, China.
Xiaonan DuDepartment of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 201102, China.
Xiu XuDepartment of Child Health, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 201102, China.
Weili YanDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 201102, China.
Yi WangDepartment of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 201102, China. yiwang@shmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Autism Spectrum Rating Scale (ASRS) and the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) have been widely used for screening autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the general population during epidemiological studies, but studies of individuals with intellectual disability (ID) are quite limited. Therefore, we recruited the parents/caregivers of 204 ASD cases, 71 ID cases aged 6-18 years from special education schools, and 402 typically developing (TD) children in the same age span from a community-based population to complete the ASRS and SRS. The results showed that the ID group scored significantly lower on total and subscale scores than the ASD group on both scales (P < 0.05) but higher than TD children (P < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic analyses demonstrated a similar fair performance in discriminating ASD from ID with the ASRS (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.709, sensitivity = 77.0%, specificity = 52.1%, positive predictive value (PPV) = 82.2%) and the SRS (AUC = 0.742, sensitivity = 59.8%, specificity = 77.5%, PPV = 88.4%). The results showed that individuals with ID had clear autistic traits and discriminating ASD from ID cases was quite challenging, while assessment tools such as ASRS and SRS, help to some degree.

Indexed as

Social BehaviorAdolescentAge DistributionAge FactorsAutism Spectrum DisorderChildChinaFemaleHumansIntellectual DisabilityMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsRetrospective StudiesStatistics, NonparametricAutism spectrum disorderAutism Spectrum Rating ScaleIntellectual disabilityScreening accuracySocial Responsiveness Scale

Identifiers

PMID29808467
PMCPMC6246835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.