Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29808428›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2018

Improved detection rates and treatment planning of head and neck cancer using dual-layer spectral CT.

Fabian K Lohöfer, Georgios A Kaissis, Frances L Köster, Sebastian Ziegelmayer, Ingo Einspieler, Carlos Gerngross, Michael Rasper, Peter B Noel, Steffen Koerdt, Andreas Fichter and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Spectral performance evaluation of a second-generation spectral detector CT.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nanoparticle contrast agents for X-ray imaging applications.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabian K LohöferInstitute for diagnostic and interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675, München, Germany.
Georgios A KaissisInstitute for diagnostic and interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675, München, Germany.
Frances L KösterInstitute for diagnostic and interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675, München, Germany.
Sebastian ZiegelmayerInstitute for diagnostic and interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675, München, Germany.
Ingo EinspielerInstitute for diagnostic and interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675, München, Germany.
Carlos GerngrossInstitute for diagnostic and interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675, München, Germany.
Michael RasperInstitute for diagnostic and interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675, München, Germany.
Peter B NoelInstitute for diagnostic and interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675, München, Germany.
Steffen KoerdtDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675, München, Germany.
Andreas FichterDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675, München, Germany.
Ernst J RummenyInstitute for diagnostic and interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675, München, Germany.
Rickmer F BrarenInstitute for diagnostic and interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, D-81675, München, Germany. rbraren@tum.de.
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the advantages of dual-layer spectral CT (DLSCT) in detection and staging of head and neck cancer (HNC) as well as the imaging of tumour margins and infiltration depth compared to conventional contrast enhanced CT (CECT). MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-nine patients with a proven diagnosis of HNC were examined with a DLSCT scanner and retrospectively analysed. An age-matched healthy control group of the same size was used. Images were acquired in the venous phase. Virtual monoenergetic 40keV-equivalent (MonoE40) images were compared to CECT-images. Diagnostic confidence for tumour identification and margin detection was rated independently by four experienced observers. The steepness of the Hounsfield unit (HU)-increase at the tumour margin was analysed. External carotid artery branch image reconstructions were performed and their contrast compared to conventional arterial phase imaging. Means were compared using a Student's t-test. ANOVA was used for multiple comparisons.

resultsMonoE40 images were superior to CECT-images in tumour detection and margin delineation. MonoE40 showed significantly higher attenuation differences between tumour and healthy tissue compared to CECT-images (p < 0.001). The HU-increase at the boundary of the tumour was significantly steeper in MonoE40 images compared to CECT-images (p < 0.001). Iodine uptake in the tumour was significantly higher compared to healthy tissue (p < 0.001). MonoE40 compared to conventional images allowed visualisation of external carotid artery branches from the venous phase in a higher number of cases (87% vs. 67%).

conclusionDLSCT enables improved detection of primary and recurrent head and neck cancer and quantification of tumour iodine uptake. Improved contrast of MonoE40 compared to conventional reconstructions enables higher diagnostic confidence concerning tumour margin detection and vessel identification. KEY POINTS: • Sensitivity concerning tumour detection are higher using dual-layer spectral-CT than conventional CT. • Lesion to background contrast in DLSCT is significantly higher than in CECT. • DLSCT provides sufficient contrast for evaluation of external carotid artery branches.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceCarotid ArteriesCase-Control StudiesFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedCancerCarotid artery , externalContrast mediaHead and neck neoplasmsTomography , spiral computed

Identifiers

PMID29808428
OpenAlexW2805727791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.