Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29808423›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2018

Update on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Sivashakthi Kanagalingam, Prem S Subramanian

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sivashakthi KanagalingamDepartment of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Prem S SubramanianDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 1675 Aurora Court, Mailstop F-731, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. prem.subramanian@ucdenver.edu.
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review presents a critical appraisal of current therapeutic strategies for patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). We present the reader with the most recent evidence to support medical and surgical interventions in patients with IIH and provide recommendations about treatment initiation and escalation. We also indicate areas where knowledge gaps exist regarding therapeutic efficacy and superiority of one intervention over another. RECENT

findingsA double-masked, randomized prospective study of medical management of patients with mild IIH (Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial-IIHTT) has established that acetazolamide therapy has additional efficacy when compared to weight loss alone. Furthermore, management of IIH-related headache, even in patients with papilledema, may require treatment other than ICP lowering for patients to experience symptomatic relief. Finally, a number of uncontrolled interventional studies have shown transverse sinus stenting to be a potentially effective treatment for medically refractory IIH. Medical therapy with acetazolamide should be considered in addition to structured weight loss in patients with mild IIH. Surgical treatment for patients with vision-threatening disease IIH can be performed by either optic nerve sheath fenestration or cerebrospinal fluid diversion, with venous sinus stenting emerging as an alternate therapy. Headache relief from ICP lowering therapy is variable and often not sustained.

Indexed as

Idiopathic intracranial hypertensionOptic nerve sheath fenestrationPapilledemaPseudotumor cerebriTransverse sinus stenosisVenous sinus stenting

Identifiers

PMID29808423
OpenAlexW2807099763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.