ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2018
Update on Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intracranial pressure affects retinal venular complexity in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a retrospective observational study.BMC neurology · 2024Observational
- Optic Nerve Head and Retinal Changes in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Correlation with Short-Term Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure Monitoring.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Association between RS3763040 polymorphism of the AQP4 and idiopathic intracranial hypertension in a Spanish Caucasian population.Translational neuroscience · 2023Article
- Intracranial Venous Pressures Manometry for Patients With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Under Awake Setting or General Anesthesia.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review presents a critical appraisal of current therapeutic strategies for patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). We present the reader with the most recent evidence to support medical and surgical interventions in patients with IIH and provide recommendations about treatment initiation and escalation. We also indicate areas where knowledge gaps exist regarding therapeutic efficacy and superiority of one intervention over another. RECENT
findingsA double-masked, randomized prospective study of medical management of patients with mild IIH (Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Treatment Trial-IIHTT) has established that acetazolamide therapy has additional efficacy when compared to weight loss alone. Furthermore, management of IIH-related headache, even in patients with papilledema, may require treatment other than ICP lowering for patients to experience symptomatic relief. Finally, a number of uncontrolled interventional studies have shown transverse sinus stenting to be a potentially effective treatment for medically refractory IIH. Medical therapy with acetazolamide should be considered in addition to structured weight loss in patients with mild IIH. Surgical treatment for patients with vision-threatening disease IIH can be performed by either optic nerve sheath fenestration or cerebrospinal fluid diversion, with venous sinus stenting emerging as an alternate therapy. Headache relief from ICP lowering therapy is variable and often not sustained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.