SynthesisJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2018
Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): a growing global phenomenon with multidimensional implications (a systematic and critical review).
Synthesis in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ghost mothers: Ethical challenges in Iran as an emerging destination for cross-border surrogacy: A case report.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2026Article
- Expanding the Digital, Donor-Assisted Conception Tool to Empower Parental Telling and Talking (TELL Tool) Intervention to the Pregnant and Early Parenthood Periods: Findings From a Qualitative Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Navigating Structural Tensions: Australian Surrogacy Facilitators' Understanding on Children's Rights in Cross-Border Surrogacy.Asian bioethics review · 2026Article
- From reproductive violence to empowerment: reconquering power in assisted reproduction - a qualitative study.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Consequences for Australian Recipients of Cross Border Oocyte Donation in South Africa: Double Embryo Transfer and Donor Anonymity.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2025Article
- The Fertility Market in Latin America and Brazil: A Narrative Review of Trends and Key Players.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2025Review
- Does flying after embryo transfer impact implantation?JBRA assisted reproduction · 2025Article
- Oocyte cryopreservation for fertility preservation in transgender and gender diverse individuals: a SWOT analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Review
- Diagnosing a genetic disease in a donor-conceived child: case report and discussion of the ethical, legal, and practical issues.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025Review
- Personal interest and attitudes towards oocyte donation practice: a cross-sectional survey among Dutch-speaking young women in Belgium.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- The costs per live birth after uterus transplantation: results of the Swedish live donor trial.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Mapping the path to domestic surrogacy: Identifying key facilitators and barriers in the Netherlands.PloS one · 2025Article
- Current legal standpoint on surrogacy in Hungary.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Financial cost of assisted reproductive technology for patients in high-income countries: A systematic review protocol.PloS one · 2025Article
- Policy solutions to improve access to fertility treatment and optimise patient care: consensus from an expert forum.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Review
- Determinants of the economic burden of ART on the Italian NHS: insights from the Lombardy region.Health economics review · 2024Article
- Alignment, Anticipation, Adaptation, or Lagging Behind? Age-Based Regulations in Assisted Reproduction and Late Fertility.Population and development review · 2024Article
- Mapping Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) of gamete donation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
- Reflecting sex, social class and race inequalities in reproduction? Study of the gender representations conveyed by 38 fertility centre websites in 8 European countries.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Oocyte donors' experience and expectations in a non-profit fertility care setting.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMany people travel abroad to access fertility treatments. This growing phenomenon is known as cross border reproductive care (CBRC) or fertility tourism. Due to its complex nature and implications worldwide, CBRC has become an emerging dilemma deserving more attention on the global healthcare agenda.
methodsAccording to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was performed for all relevant full-text articles published in PubMed in English during the past 18 years to explore CBRC phenomenon in the new millennium.
resultsLittle is known about the accurate magnitude and scope of CBRC around the globe. In this systematic and critical review, we identify three major dimensions of CBRC: legal, economic, and ethical. We analyze each of these dimensions from clinical and practical perspectives.
conclusionCBRC is a growing reality worldwide with potential benefits and risks. Therefore, it is very crucial to regulate the global market of CBRC on legal, economic, and ethical bases in order to increase harmonization and reduce any forms of exploitation. Establishment of accurate international statistics and a global registry will help diminish the current information gap surrounding the CBRC phenomenon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.