Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29808363›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2018

The feasibility of high-pitch acquisition protocol for imaging of the pediatric abdomen by dual-source CT.

Eray Atlı, Erhan Akpınar, Emre Ünal, Berna Oğuz Sayan, Mithat Haliloğlu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eray AtlıDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. atlieray@gmail.com.
Erhan AkpınarDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Emre ÜnalDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Berna Oğuz SayanDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Mithat HaliloğluDepartment of Radiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate feasibility of high-pitch acquisition protocol for imaging of pediatric abdomen. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study group consisted of 90 patients scanned with high-pitch acquisition protocol (pitch = 3) by 64-slice dual-source CT (DSCT) scanner. Fifty-four patients scanned with standard protocol (pitch = 1.5) by 16-slice single-source CT scanner comprised the control group. Anteroposterior and lateral diameters of abdomen, effective diameter, scan time and length, qualitative and quantitative noise levels, volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), and size-specific dose estimations were compared between groups.

resultsThe mean scan time of high-pitch CT protocol was shorter than control protocol (1.66 ± 0.31 vs. 4.1 ± 0.75 s; p < 0.001). The high-pitch protocol reduced the radiation dose by 48% (CTDIvol and DLP values 0.94 mGy and 32.2 mGy-cm vs. 1.59 mGy and 61.5 mGy-cm; p < 0.001, respectively). Although image noise was higher with high-pitch acquisition, there was no significant effect on diagnostic confidence. Voluntary and involuntary artifacts were less frequent in high-pitch protocol (p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement was moderate in terms of artifact and very good in terms of diagnostic confidence assessment.

conclusionHigh-pitch acquisition protocol by DSCT yields significant radiation dose reduction without compromising image quality and diagnostic confidence for pediatric abdomen imaging.

Indexed as

ArtifactsChildChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleRadiation DosageRadiography, AbdominalTomography, X-Ray ComputedAbdominal CTDual sourceHigh pitchPediatricsRadiation dose

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.