ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2018
The feasibility of high-pitch acquisition protocol for imaging of the pediatric abdomen by dual-source CT.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Computed Tomography (CT) for Structurally Complex Organisms: A Case Study of Gastropod Shell Features.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Thoracic-abdominopelvic contrast-enhanced dual-source computed tomography with a high-pitch acquisition protocol and free breathing for reducing motion artifacts and scan time in patients with cancer: a prospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate feasibility of high-pitch acquisition protocol for imaging of pediatric abdomen. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study group consisted of 90 patients scanned with high-pitch acquisition protocol (pitch = 3) by 64-slice dual-source CT (DSCT) scanner. Fifty-four patients scanned with standard protocol (pitch = 1.5) by 16-slice single-source CT scanner comprised the control group. Anteroposterior and lateral diameters of abdomen, effective diameter, scan time and length, qualitative and quantitative noise levels, volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP), and size-specific dose estimations were compared between groups.
resultsThe mean scan time of high-pitch CT protocol was shorter than control protocol (1.66 ± 0.31 vs. 4.1 ± 0.75 s; p < 0.001). The high-pitch protocol reduced the radiation dose by 48% (CTDIvol and DLP values 0.94 mGy and 32.2 mGy-cm vs. 1.59 mGy and 61.5 mGy-cm; p < 0.001, respectively). Although image noise was higher with high-pitch acquisition, there was no significant effect on diagnostic confidence. Voluntary and involuntary artifacts were less frequent in high-pitch protocol (p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement was moderate in terms of artifact and very good in terms of diagnostic confidence assessment.
conclusionHigh-pitch acquisition protocol by DSCT yields significant radiation dose reduction without compromising image quality and diagnostic confidence for pediatric abdomen imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29808363What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.