Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29808321›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2019

Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative perfusion-weighted MRI and 5-aminolevulinic acid in relation to contrast-enhanced intraoperative MRI and

Andrej Pala, Sven N Reske, Nina Eberhardt, Angelika Scheuerle, Ralph König, Bernd Schmitz, Ambros J Beer, Christian R Wirtz, Jan Coburger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Glioblastoma and Methionine Addiction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrej PalaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Ulm, Ludwig-Heilmeyerstr. 2, 89312, Günzburg, Germany. andrej.pala@uni-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6653-701X
Sven N ReskeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Nina EberhardtDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Angelika ScheuerleDepartment of Neuropathology, University of Ulm, Ludwig-Heilmeyerstr. 2, 89312, Günzburg, Germany.
Ralph KönigDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Ulm, Ludwig-Heilmeyerstr. 2, 89312, Günzburg, Germany.
Bernd SchmitzDepartment of Neuroradiology, University of Ulm, Ludwig-Heilmeyerstr. 2, 89312, Günzburg, Germany.
Ambros J BeerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Christian R WirtzDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Ulm, Ludwig-Heilmeyerstr. 2, 89312, Günzburg, Germany.
Jan CoburgerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Ulm, Ludwig-Heilmeyerstr. 2, 89312, Günzburg, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of our study was to compare depicted pre-, intra-, and postoperative tumor volume of met-PET, perfusion-weighed MRI (PWI), and Gd-DTPA MRI. Further, to assess their sensitivity and specificity in correlation with histopathological specimen. Inclusion criteria of the prospective study were histological confirmed glioblastoma (GB), age > 18, and eligible for gross total resection (GTR). Met-PET was performed before and after surgery. Gd-DTPA MRI and PWI were performed before, during, and after surgery. A combined 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and iMRI-guided surgery was performed. Volumetric analysis was evaluated for all imaging modalities except for 5-ALA. A total of 59 navigated biopsies were taken. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for Gd-DTPA MRI, PWI, met-PET, and 5-ALA according to the histology of specimen. Met-PET depicted significantly larger tumor volume before surgery (p = 0.01) compared to PWI and Gd-DTPI MRI. We found no significant difference in tumor volume between met-PET and PWI after surgery (p = 0.059). Both PWI and met-PET showed significantly larger tumor volume after surgery when compared to Gd-DTPA (p = 0.018 and p = 0.003, respectively). Intraoperative PWI reading was impaired in 33.3% due to artifacts. Met-PET showed the highest sensitivity for detection of GB with 95%. The lowest sensitivity was found with Gd-DTPA MRI (50%), while 5-ALA and intraoperative PWI showed similar results (69 and 67%). Met-Pet is the imaging modality with the highest sensitivity to detect a residual tumor in GB. Intraoperative PWI seems to have a synergistic effect to Gd-DTPA and 5-ALA. However, its value may be limited by artifacts. Both pre- and intraoperative PWI cannot substitute met-PET in tumor detection.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyAdultAgedAminolevulinic AcidBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGadolinium DTPAGlioblastomaHumansMaleMethionineMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualPhotosensitizing AgentsProspective StudiesAminolevulinic AcidGadolinium DTPAMethioninePhotosensitizing AgentsRadiopharmaceuticals11C-methionine PET5-ALAGd-DTPA MRIGlioblastomaPWI

Identifiers

PMID29808321
OpenAlexW2805757298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.