ReviewWorld journal of urology2018
Early neurological care of patients with spinal cord injury.
Review in World journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma with intrathecal metastasis: a case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Early functional proprioceptive stimulation in high spinal cord injury: a pilot study.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- The Impact of Interdisciplinary Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation on Improving Neurological Outcomes.Global spine journal · 2021Article
- Letter to the Editor: "Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and Traumatic Cervical Acute Spinal Cord Injury: An Appraisal".World neurosurgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeConsidering the major clinical challenges of managing patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), we summarized the relevant aspects of the early (within 1 year after SCI) neurological care emphasizing common standards.
methodsThis review was performed according to the methodology recommended by the Joint SIU-ICUD International Consultation. Embase and Medline databases were used to identify literature relevant to the early neurological care of SCI patients. Recommendations were developed by consensus and graded using a modified Oxford system which identifies level of evidence (LOE) and grade of recommendation (GOR).
resultsEmergency health care providers must address altered mental status, evidence of intoxication, suspected extremity fracture/distracting injury, focal neurological deficit and spinal pain/tenderness to determine the risk of SCI in a trauma patient [LOE 1, GOR A]. Neurogenic shock must be recognized and treated [LOE 3, GOR A]. Spine surgeons should consider early decompression and spine fixation/stabilization, where indicated, and should promote early active rehabilitation to improve functional recovery [LOE 2, GOR B]. Clinicians should refer SCI patients to specialized SCI rehabilitation centers [LOE 4, GOR B], must apply interventions to prevent venous thromboembolism (i.e., compression devices and low-molecular weight heparin/unfractionated heparin) after acute SCI respecting contraindications [LOE 1, GOR A]. Contemporary guidelines to manage pain must be employed [LOE 1, GOR A] and methods to reduce the risk of pressure ulcers should be used [LOE 3, GOR B].
conclusionsEarly treatment, prevention of associated complications and individualized patient-targeted rehabilitation programs provided by a specialized interdisciplinary team are crucial to optimize the outcome after SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.