Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29808240›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2018

[Fetal magnetic resonance imaging].

W Reith, A Haussmann, U Yilmaz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 74% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W ReithKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Straße, 66424, Homburg-Saar, Deutschland. Wolfgang.Reith@uks.eu.
A HaussmannKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Straße, 66424, Homburg-Saar, Deutschland.
U YilmazKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Straße, 66424, Homburg-Saar, Deutschland.
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical issueThe most important prenatal screening method for the detailed assessment of the fetus is ultrasound, which is often combined with colour-coded Doppler sonography. In case of sonographically diagnosed fetal pathologies or technical limitations of the ultrasound, supplementary diagnostics may be necessary. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsWith fast MRI sequences, fetal MRI screening provides important additional information especially with regard to the most common congenital pathologies-central nervous system (CNS) pathologies (agenesis of the corpus callosum, ventriculomegaly, arachnoid cyst, pathologies of the posterior cranial fossa, dysfunction of the gyrification). Knowledge of the developmental stages of the CNS is very important for accurate clinical assessment and interpretation.

Indexed as

Agenesis of Corpus CallosumUltrasonography, PrenatalFemaleFetusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisCentral nervous systemCongenital abnomalitiesEmbryonic developmentPrenatal screeningUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID29808240
OpenAlexW2985973868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.