Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29808237›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2018

Treatment and outcome data of very low birth weight infants treated with less invasive surfactant administration in comparison to intubation and mechanical ventilation in the clinical setting of a cross-sectional observational multicenter study.

Kristina Langhammer, Bernhard Roth, Angela Kribs, Wolfgang Göpel, Ludwig Kuntz, Felix Miedaner

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Less invasive surfactant administration in the delivery room: A quality improvement initiative.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristina LanghammerDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of the University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany. kristina.langhammer@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5118-1994
Bernhard RothDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of the University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Angela KribsDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of the University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
Wolfgang GöpelDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Ludwig KuntzDepartment of Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Cologne, Dürener Str. 56-60, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Felix MiedanerDepartment of Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Cologne, Dürener Str. 56-60, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
University of Cologne · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

BMBF (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung) 01GY1152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to contribute further to existing randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses showing advantages in the outcome of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA)-treated infants and add new aspects concerning treatment and outcome data collected in the routine clinical setting. Four hundred seven very low birth weight infants who received surfactant via either LISA or intubation methods were enrolled in the observational cross-sectional multicenter study. To compare infants in terms of surfactant administration, we used an exact matching procedure (the same gestational age, severe perinatal depression (pH < 7.10), birth weight < 10th percentile, antenatal steroid treatment, and the same gender). To check for robustness, we performed repeated matching. LISA-treated infants required significantly less mechanical ventilation during hospital stay (p < 0.001) and days with supplemental oxygen (p = 0.03). Analgesics and sedatives were used less often during the stay (p < 0.001). Infants treated with LISA had significantly lower rates of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (p = 0.003). LISA failure infants were identified as more likely to be small for gestational age and more immature.

conclusionOur study complements former results with advantages for LISA-treated infants in mechanical ventilation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in the clinical routine.

trial registrationDRKS00004589 What is Known: • According to existing literature, LISA-treated infants seem to have some favors in terms of treatment and outcome data. Observational studies in routine clinical setting are missing. What is New: • Data of 407 VLBW infants collected in routine clinical setting showed that LISA-treated infants needed less mechanical ventilation and fewer days with supplemental oxygen and less analgesics and sedatives. A reduced risk of BPD could be showed. SGA infants seem to have higher risks of LISA failure.

Indexed as

Infant, Very Low Birth WeightIntubation, IntratrachealRespiration, ArtificialBronchopulmonary DysplasiaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMalePulmonary SurfactantsTreatment OutcomePulmonary SurfactantsBronchopulmonary dysplasiaCPAPLess invasive surfactant administrationRespiratory distress syndromeVery low birth weight infants

Identifiers

PMID29808237
OpenAlexW2805474494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.