Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29808015›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2018

Checkpoint blockade in the treatment of breast cancer: current status and future directions.

Lironne Wein, Stephen J Luen, Peter Savas, Roberto Salgado, Sherene Loi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. POSTNOncology reports · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lironne WeinPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Stephen J LuenPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Peter SavasPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Roberto SalgadoPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sherene LoiPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. sherene.loi@petermac.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is now accumulating evidence that the host immune system plays an important role in influencing response to treatment and prognosis in breast cancer. Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors is a promising and rapidly growing field of interest in many solid tumours, including breast cancer. Trials to date have largely focused on metastatic triple-negative disease, a genomically unstable subtype of breast cancer that is believed to be the most immunogenic and following the development of treatment resistance, has limited treatment options and a particularly poor prognosis. Both checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy and combinations with chemotherapy are being investigated. In this review, we discuss the current evidence for PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), HER2+ breast cancer and ER+ disease, as well as the emerging evidence for use in the early-stage (neoadjuvant) setting. We also propose potential ways of improving responses to checkpoint blockade in breast cancer.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyB7-H1 AntigenCombined Modality TherapyDrug Resistance, NeoplasmErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorReceptors, EstrogenTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID29808015
PMCPMC6035268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.