ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2018
Cybersecurity in Hospitals: A Systematic, Organizational Perspective.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Vulnerability to Cyberattacks and Sociotechnical Solutions for Health Care Systems: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Influence of Human Factors on Cyber Security within Healthcare Organisations: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Pooled it
- Hospital Bring-Your-Own-Device Security Challenges and Solutions: Systematic Review of Gray Literature.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Privacy-Preserving Distributed Machine Learning From Federated Databases in Health Care.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2020Pooled it
- EARS to cyber incidents in health care.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019Pooled it
- Motivational Framing Strategies in Health Care Information Security Training: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR medical education · 2025Trial
- Telehealth implementation for military combat casualty care and evacuation: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Protecting Radiology Data and Devices Against Cybersecurity Threats: A Joint White Paper of the American College of Radiology (ACR) and Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM).Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Prompt injection attacks on vision-language models for surgical decision support.npj digital surgery · 2026Article
- Mapping digital transformation and social impact in Italian healthcare: a holistic evaluation of organizational digital maturity.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Information security behavior of healthcare professionals in the Sultanate of Oman based on the PMT model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Virtual Hospital, Real Health Care.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Review
- Sociotechnical Cybersecurity Framework for Securing Health Care From Vulnerabilities and Cyberattacks: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Bridging data gaps and tackling human vulnerabilities in healthcare cybersecurity with generative AI.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Digital health technologies/interventions in smart ward development for elderly patients with diabetes: A perspective from China and beyond.World journal of diabetes · 2025Review
- The Role of the Organization in Promoting Information Security-Related Behavior Among Resident Physicians in Hospitals in Germany: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Cybersecurity governance in the healthcare sector during digital transformation: an integrated model and hybrid analytical approach.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Progress Achieved, Landmarks, and Future Concerns in Biomedical and Health Informatics.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The need for cybersecurity self-evaluation in healthcare.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCybersecurity incidents are a growing threat to the health care industry in general and hospitals in particular. The health care industry has lagged behind other industries in protecting its main stakeholder (ie, patients), and now hospitals must invest considerable capital and effort in protecting their systems. However, this is easier said than done because hospitals are extraordinarily technology-saturated, complex organizations with high end point complexity, internal politics, and regulatory pressures.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to develop a systematic and organizational perspective for studying (1) the dynamics of cybersecurity capability development at hospitals and (2) how these internal organizational dynamics interact to form a system of hospital cybersecurity in the United States.
methodsWe conducted interviews with hospital chief information officers, chief information security officers, and health care cybersecurity experts; analyzed the interview data; and developed a system dynamics model that unravels the mechanisms by which hospitals build cybersecurity capabilities. We then use simulation analysis to examine how changes to variables within the model affect the likelihood of cyberattacks across both individual hospitals and a system of hospitals.
resultsWe discuss several key mechanisms that hospitals use to reduce the likelihood of cybercriminal activity. The variable that most influences the risk of cyberattack in a hospital is end point complexity, followed by internal stakeholder alignment. Although resource availability is important in fueling efforts to close cybersecurity capability gaps, low levels of resources could be compensated for by setting a high target level of cybersecurity.
conclusionsTo enhance cybersecurity capabilities at hospitals, the main focus of chief information officers and chief information security officers should be on reducing end point complexity and improving internal stakeholder alignment. These strategies can solve cybersecurity problems more effectively than blindly pursuing more resources. On a macro level, the cyber vulnerability of a country's hospital infrastructure is affected by the vulnerabilities of all individual hospitals. In this large system, reducing variation in resource availability makes the whole system less vulnerable-a few hospitals with low resources for cybersecurity threaten the entire infrastructure of health care. In other words, hospitals need to move forward together to make the industry less attractive to cybercriminals. Moreover, although compliance is essential, it does not equal security. Hospitals should set their target level of cybersecurity beyond the requirements of current regulations and policies. As of today, policies mostly address data privacy, not data security. Thus, policy makers need to introduce policies that not only raise the target level of cybersecurity capabilities but also reduce the variability in resource availability across the entire health care system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.