Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29807751›Full record

ArticleJournal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine

Ethics Committees in Ayurvedic PG institutions: Losing opportunities of making an impact.

Sanjeev Rastogi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sanjeev RastogiState Ayurvedic College and Hospital, Lucknow, India. Electronic address: rastogisanjeev@rediffmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethics is a crucial component of medical practice world over and also an indispensable part of medical research. Ethics in medical practice primarily refers to not harming the patients by the proposed interventions; similarly ethics in research refers to assuring optimal care of the participants and causing no harm to them on account of research. Ethics in research has come a long way from its voluntarily application on moral grounds to a mandatory condition regulated by the state of law. Ethics Committees (ECs) have been erected at research institutions to safeguard the interest of patients, to ensure their safety during any such trial and to assure the accountability of the researcher in case of any unforeseen event. Such committees therefore have a noble role to play in the form of promoting ethical practices in research. Ayurvedic clinical research also follows the similar path by erecting ECs at its research institutions. However, in reality, such committees are found much away from the principle of their inception and method of functioning. In the absence of accountability and clear objectivity, such ECs at Ayurvedic research institutions are not serving any purpose. This article critically examines the positioning of ECs at Ayurveda research institutions and suggests pragmatic mechanisms to ensure their role in improving the quality of research in Ayurveda.

Indexed as

Ayurveda researchClinical researchEthics committeeResearch committee

Identifiers

PMID29807751
PMCPMC6033734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.