ArticleTrends in biotechnology2018
A Welcome Proposal to Amend the GMO Legislation of the EU.
Article in Trends in biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial Biotechnology in Agriculture.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026Review
- To patent or not to patent: challenges and solutions to the patent ban on new genomic techniques plant in EU.GM crops & food · 2025Review
- Advances in genome editing in plants within an evolving regulatory landscape, with a focus on its application in wheat breeding.Journal of plant biochemistry and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Processes for regulating genetically modified and gene edited plants.GM crops & food · 2023Review
- Maize Lethal Necrosis disease: review of molecular and genetic resistance mechanisms, socio-economic impacts, and mitigation strategies in sub-Saharan Africa.BMC plant biology · 2022Review
- Advances in Synthetic Biology and Biosafety Governance.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
- Recent Advances of In Vitro Culture for the Application of New Breeding Techniques in Citrus.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Assessment of Gene Flow to Wild Relatives and Nutritional Composition of Sugarcane in Brazil.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Development of Triticale × Wheat Prebreeding Germplasm With Loci for Slow-Rusting Resistance.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Shotguns vs Lasers: Identifying barriers and facilitators to scaling-up plant molecular farming for high-value health products.PloS one · 2020Article
- Lager-brewing yeasts in the era of modern genetics.FEMS yeast research · 2019Review
- The Judgment of the CJEU of 25 July 2018 on Mutagenesis: Interpretation and Interim Legislative Proposal.Frontiers in plant science · 2019Article
- Bottlenecks for genome-edited crops on the road from lab to farm.Genome biology · 2018Article
- Article
- Genetic Alterations That Do or Do Not Occur Naturally; Consequences for Genome Edited Organisms in the Context of Regulatory Oversight.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2018Article
- Revisiting Risk Governance of GM Plants: The Need to Consider New and Emerging Gene-Editing Techniques.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Is the European Union (EU) regulatory framework for genetically modified organisms (GMOs) adequate for emerging techniques, such as genome editing? This has been discussed extensively for more than 10 years. A recent proposal from The Netherlands offers a way to break the deadlock. Here, we discuss how the proposal would affect examples from public plant research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.