Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29807570›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Differential temporal dynamics during visual imagery and perception.

Nadine Dijkstra, Pim Mostert, Floris P de Lange, Sander Bosch, Marcel Aj van Gerven

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Contents of Visual Predictions Oscillate at Alpha Frequencies.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. ADA: A decoding algorithm for temporally-variable brain responses.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neural Representations in Visual and Parietal Cortex Differentiate between Imagined, Perceived, and Illusory Experiences.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Nadine DijkstraDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1423-9277
Pim MostertDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Floris P de LangeDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Sander BoschDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Marcel Aj van GervenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual perception and imagery rely on similar representations in the visual cortex. During perception, visual activity is characterized by distinct processing stages, but the temporal dynamics underlying imagery remain unclear. Here, we investigated the dynamics of visual imagery in human participants using magnetoencephalography. Firstly, we show that, compared to perception, imagery decoding becomes significant later and representations at the start of imagery already overlap with later time points. This suggests that during imagery, the entire visual representation is activated at once or that there are large differences in the timing of imagery between trials. Secondly, we found consistent overlap between imagery and perceptual processing around 160 ms and from 300 ms after stimulus onset. This indicates that the N170 gets reactivated during imagery and that imagery does not rely on early perceptual representations. Together, these results provide important insights for our understanding of the neural mechanisms of visual imagery.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansImaginationMagnetoencephalographyMalePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationTime FactorsVisual CortexhumanMEGmental imagerymultivariate analysisneurosciencevisual perception

Identifiers

PMID29807570
PMCPMC5973830
OpenAlexW2782371820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.