Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29807477›Full record

Trial reportLupus2018

A 6-month open-label extension study of the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

A Doria, D Bass, A Schwarting, A Hammer, D Gordon, M Scheinberg, N L Fox, J Groark, W Stohl, C Kleoudis and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lupus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01484496 (A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 52-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01484496 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 52-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab (HGS1006) Administered Subcutaneously (SC) to Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHuman Genome Sciences Inc., a GSK CompanyRan2011 to 2015Enrolled839ConditionsSystemic Lupus ErythematosusArmsPlacebo, Belimumab 200 mg SC, Standard therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Belimumab for systemic lupus erythematosus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

A Doria1 Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
D Bass2 GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
A Schwarting3 Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
A Hammer2 GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
D Gordon2 GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
M Scheinberg5 Centro de Pesquisas Clinicas do Hospital Abreu Sodré, São Paulo, Brazil.
N L Fox6 GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Rockville, MD, USA.
J Groark2 GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
W Stohl7 Division of Rheumatology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
C Kleoudis8 Parexel Clinical Research, Raleigh-Durham, NC, USA.
D Roth2 GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) beyond 1 year. Methods This was a 24-week, open-label extension following a 52-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of belimumab SC. Patients who completed the double-blind phase were eligible to enter the open-label phase. All patients received weekly belimumab 200 mg SC plus standard SLE therapy. Outcome measures included safety and efficacy (SLE Response Index (SRI) and SLE Flare Index (SFI) rates), and changes in biomarker and B cell levels. Results Of 677 patients who completed the 52-week, double-blind phase, 662 entered the open-label phase; 206 had previously received placebo and 456 had previously received belimumab. Despite differences in total belimumab exposure (24 weeks in the placebo-to-belimumab group versus 76 weeks in the belimumab group), the proportions of patients experiencing more than one adverse event (AE) or a serious AE in the open-label phase were similar between groups (placebo-to-belimumab: 51.5 and 6.8%; belimumab: 48.2 and 5.5%, respectively). Most AEs were mild/moderate in severity. Efficacy was maintained through the extension phase. An SRI response was achieved by 16.1% of patients in the placebo-to-belimumab group and 76.3% patients in the belimumab group. Furthermore, 1.0% of patients in the placebo-to-belimumab group and 2.6% of patients in the belimumab group experienced a severe SFI flare. Conclusion Belimumab SC was well tolerated and efficacy was maintained during the extension phase of this study. The safety profile of belimumab SC is consistent with that of previous experience with belimumab. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01484496.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBiomarkersDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInjections, SubcutaneousLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleMiddle AgedPrednisoneSymptom Flare UpTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedbelimumabBiomarkersGlucocorticoidsImmunosuppressive AgentsPrednisoneBelimumabB-lymphocyte stimulatorcorticosteroidsopen-label extensionSLE responder indexsubcutaneoussystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID29807477
PMCPMC6066857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.