Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29807441›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of health promotion : AJHP2019

Effectiveness of an Energy Management Training Course on Employee Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Sai Krupa Das, Shawn T Mason, Taylor A Vail, Gail V Rogers, Kara A Livingston, Jillian G Whelan, Meghan K Chin, Caroline M Blanchard, Jennifer L Turgiss, Susan B Roberts

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of health promotion : AJHP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sai Krupa Das1 Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Shawn T Mason2 Johnson & Johnson, Health and Wellness Solutions Inc, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Taylor A Vail1 Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Gail V Rogers1 Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Kara A Livingston1 Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Jillian G Whelan1 Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Meghan K Chin1 Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Caroline M Blanchard1 Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer L Turgiss2 Johnson & Johnson, Health and Wellness Solutions Inc, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Susan B Roberts1 Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrograms focused on employee well-being have gained momentum in recent years, but few have been rigorously evaluated. This study evaluates the effectiveness of an intervention designed to enhance vitality and purpose in life by assessing changes in employee quality of life (QoL) and health-related behaviors.

designA worksite-based randomized controlled trial.

settingTwelve eligible worksites (8 randomized to the intervention group [IG] and 4 to the wait-listed control group [CG]).

participantsEmployees (n = 240) at the randomized worksites.

interventionA 2.5-day group-based behavioral intervention. MEASURES: Rand Medical Outcomes Survey (MOS) 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) vitality and QoL measures, Ryff Purpose in Life Scale, Center for Epidemiologic Studies questionnaire for depression, MOS sleep, body weight, physical activity, diet quality, and blood measures for glucose and lipids (which were used to calculate a cardiometabolic risk score) obtained at baseline and 6 months. ANALYSIS: General linear mixed models were used to compare least squares means or prevalence differences in outcomes between IG and CG participants.

resultsAs compared to CG, IG had a significantly higher mean 6-month change on the SF-36 vitality scale ( P = .003) and scored in the highest categories for 5 of the remaining 7 SF-36 domains: general health ( P = .014), mental health ( P = .027), absence of role limitations due to physical problems ( P = .026), and social functioning ( P = .007). The IG also had greater improvements in purpose in life ( P < .001) and sleep quality (index I, P = .024; index II, P = .021). No statistically significant changes were observed for weight, diet, physical activity, or cardiometabolic risk factors.

conclusionAn intensive 2.5-day intervention showed improvement in employee QoL and well-being over 6 months.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthEducationExerciseFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplacebehavior change interventionemployee wellness programpurpose in lifequality of lifewell-being intervention

Identifiers

PMID29807441
PMCPMC7323760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.