Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29807387›Full record

SynthesisBJU international2019

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of lymphovascular invasion in bladder cancer transurethral resection specimens.

Andrea Mari, Shoji Kimura, Beat Foerster, Mohammad Abufaraj, David D'Andrea, Melanie Hassler, Andrea Minervini, Morgan Rouprêt, Marko Babjuk, Shahrokh F Shariat

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJU international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Metabolomic Signatures of Treatment Response in Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Canadian Urological Association guideline on the management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer - Full-text.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in oncology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea MariDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9070-5706
Shoji KimuraDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Beat FoersterDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7864-408X
Mohammad AbufarajDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6603-6319
David D'AndreaDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1625-1077
Melanie HasslerDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Andrea MinerviniDepartment of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5140-4628
Morgan RouprêtGRC no 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8440-7075
Marko BabjukDepartment of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6627-6179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present review was to assess the prognostic impact of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in transurethral resection (TUR) of bladder cancer (BCa) specimens on clinical outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature from the past 10 years was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library in August 2017. The protocol for this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (Central Registration Depository: CRD42018084876) and is available in full on the University of York website. Overall, 33 studies (including 6194 patients) evaluating the presence of LVI at TUR were retrieved. LVI was detected in 17.3% of TUR specimens. In 19 studies, including 2941 patients with ≤cT1 stage only, LVI was detected in 15% of specimens. In patients with ≤cT1 stage, LVI at TUR of the bladder tumour (TURBT) was a significant prognostic factor for disease recurrence (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 1.97, 95% CI: 1.47-2.62) and progression (pooled HR 2.95, 95% CI: 2.11-4.13), without heterogeneity (I

Indexed as

Blood VesselsCystectomyDisease ProgressionHumansLymphatic VesselsNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisUrinary Bladder Neoplasms#BladderCancer#blcsmlymphovascular invasionmeta-analysisprogressionrecurrencetransurethral resectionupstaging

Identifiers

PMID29807387
PMCPMC7379926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.