Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29807123›Full record

ArticleAppetite2018

Fast-food, everyday life and health: A qualitative study of 'chicken shops' in East London.

Claire Thompson, Ruth Ponsford, Daniel Lewis, Steven Cummins

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Spatial Aspects of Health-Developing a Conceptual Framework.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neighbourhood fast food exposure and consumption: the mediating role of neighbourhood social norms.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Yonder: Chicken shops, bronchiectasis, fertility, and regrets.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claire ThompsonDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, WC1H 9SH, London, UK. Electronic address: claire.thompson@lshtm.ac.uk.
Ruth PonsfordDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, WC1H 9SH, London, UK. Electronic address: ruth.ponsford@lshtm.ac.uk.
Daniel LewisDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, WC1H 9SH, London, UK. Electronic address: daniel.lewis@lshtm.ac.uk.
Steven CumminsDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, WC1H 9SH, London, UK. Electronic address: steven.cummins@lshtm.ac.uk.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Department of Health 09/3005/09Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The higher prevalence of fast food outlets in deprived areas has been associated with the production and maintenance of geographical inequalities in diet. In the UK one type of fast food outlet - the 'chicken shop' - has been the focus of intense public health and media interest. Despite ongoing concerns and initiatives around regulating these establishments, the 'chicken shop' is both a commercially successful and ubiquitous feature of disadvantaged urban neighbourhoods. However, little is known about how they are perceived by local residents. We report data from a qualitative study of neighbourhood perceptions in a low SES urban setting. Narrative family interviews, go-along interviews and school video focus group workshops with 66 residents of East London were conducted over two waves. The topic of chicken shops was a prolific theme and a narrative analysis of these accounts revealed that local perceptions of chicken shops are complex and contradictory. Chicken shops were depicted as both potentially damaging for the health of local residents and, at the same time, as valued community spaces. This contradiction was discursively addressed in narrative via a series of rhetorical rebuttals that negated their potential to damage health on the grounds of concepts such as trust, choice, balance, food hygiene and compensatory physical activity. In some instances, chicken shops were described as 'healthy' and patronising them constructed as part of a healthy lifestyle. Chicken shops are embedded in the social fabric of neighbourhoods. Successful strategies to improve diet therefore requires context-sensitive environmental interventions.

Indexed as

Fast FoodsAdolescentAdultAnimalsChickensChildDietFamilyFeeding BehaviorFemaleFocus GroupsGeographyHumansLondonMalePoultryChicken shopsEast LondonFast foodFood environmentHealthNewhamQualitative

Identifiers

PMID29807123
PMCPMC6059357
OpenAlexW2804831893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.