Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29806955›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2018

An evaluation by the Norwegian Health Care Supervision Authorities of events involving death or injuries in maternity care.

Lars Thomas Johansen, Geir Sverre Braut, Jan Fredrik Andresen, Pål Øian

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Detection of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: From the fear of malpractice to a quality indicator of a center.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Causes for Medical Errors in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lars Thomas JohansenNorwegian Board of Health Supervision, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1524-0640
Geir Sverre BrautStavanger University Hospital and Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Stavanger, Norway.
Jan Fredrik AndresenNorwegian Board of Health Supervision, Oslo, Norway.
Pål ØianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Clinical Medicine, The University Hospital of North Norway, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Norwegian Directorate of Health · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NOWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe aimed to determine how serious adverse events in obstetrics were assessed by supervision authorities. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe selected cases investigated by supervision authorities during 2009-2013. We analyzed information about who reported the event, the outcomes of the mother and infant, and whether events resulted from errors at the individual or system level. We also assessed whether the injuries could have been avoided.

resultsDuring the study period, there were 303 034 births in Norway, and supervision authorities investigated 338 adverse events in obstetric care. Of these, we studied 207 cases that involved a serious outcome for mother or infant. Five mothers (2.4%) and 88 infants (42.5%) died. Of the 207 events reported to the supervision authorities, patients or relatives reported 65.2%, hospitals reported 39.1%, and others reported 4.3%. In 8.7% of cases, events were reported by more than 1 source. The supervision authority assessments showed that 48.3% of the reported cases involved serious errors in the provision of health care, and a system error was the most common cause. We found that supervision authorities investigated significantly more events in small and medium-sized maternity units than in large units. Eighteen health personnel received reactions; 15 were given a warning, and 3 had their authority limited. We determined that 45.9% of the events were avoidable.

conclusionsThe supervision authorities investigated 1 in 1000 births, mainly in response to complaints issued from patients or relatives. System errors were the most common cause of deficiencies in maternity care.

Indexed as

Infant MortalityBirth InjuriesClinical CompetenceFemaleFetal MonitoringHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInterprofessional RelationsMalpracticeMedical ErrorsNorwayObstetricsObstetrics and Gynecology Department, HospitalPregnancyProfessional Roleadministrative reactionbirth injuryindividual errorsupervision authoritysystem error

Identifiers

PMID29806955
PMCPMC6175322
OpenAlexW2805889014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.