ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2018
An evaluation by the Norwegian Health Care Supervision Authorities of events involving death or injuries in maternity care.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: From the fear of malpractice to a quality indicator of a center.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Review
- Exploring a root cause analysis team's experience with involving patients and next of kin after a sentinel event.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Characteristics and risk factors for medical malpractice among obstetric and gynecologic physicians in China.BMC health services research · 2025Observational
- The association between midwifery staffing and reported harmful incidents: a cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected data.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Causes for Medical Errors in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Adverse events reporting by obstetric units in Norway as part of their quality assurance and patient safety work: an analysis of practice.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- How common is substandard obstetric care in adverse events of birth asphyxia, shoulder dystocia and postpartum hemorrhage? Findings from an external inspection of Norwegian maternity units.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2021Article
- An evaluation by the Norwegian Health Care Supervision Authorities of events involving death or injuries in maternity care.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe aimed to determine how serious adverse events in obstetrics were assessed by supervision authorities. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe selected cases investigated by supervision authorities during 2009-2013. We analyzed information about who reported the event, the outcomes of the mother and infant, and whether events resulted from errors at the individual or system level. We also assessed whether the injuries could have been avoided.
resultsDuring the study period, there were 303 034 births in Norway, and supervision authorities investigated 338 adverse events in obstetric care. Of these, we studied 207 cases that involved a serious outcome for mother or infant. Five mothers (2.4%) and 88 infants (42.5%) died. Of the 207 events reported to the supervision authorities, patients or relatives reported 65.2%, hospitals reported 39.1%, and others reported 4.3%. In 8.7% of cases, events were reported by more than 1 source. The supervision authority assessments showed that 48.3% of the reported cases involved serious errors in the provision of health care, and a system error was the most common cause. We found that supervision authorities investigated significantly more events in small and medium-sized maternity units than in large units. Eighteen health personnel received reactions; 15 were given a warning, and 3 had their authority limited. We determined that 45.9% of the events were avoidable.
conclusionsThe supervision authorities investigated 1 in 1000 births, mainly in response to complaints issued from patients or relatives. System errors were the most common cause of deficiencies in maternity care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.