Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29806864›Full record

ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2018

Effect of A Minimal-Massive Intervention in Hospitalized Older Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Proof of Concept Study.

A Martín, O Ortega, M Roca, M Arús, P Clavé

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04581486 (Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an Optimal-Massive Intervention in Older Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04581486 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an Optimal-Massive Intervention in Older Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital de MataróRan2021 to 2023Enrolled500ConditionsSwallowing Disorder, Oropharyngeal Dysphagia, Respiratory Infection, MalnutritionArmsOptimal-Massive Intervention, Control (standard clinical practice)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Swallowing Rehabilitation: Tracing the Evolution of Assessment and Intervention Approaches for Dysphagia over 30 Years.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

A MartínPere Clavé Civit, MD, PhD Surgeon. Principal Investigator. Associate Professor of Surgery Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. +34 937417700 ext. 1046. Fax: +34 937417733. e-mail: pere.clave@ciberehd.org.
O Ortega
M Roca
M Arús
P Clavé
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas · ESHospital de Mataró · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) is a newly defined geriatric syndrome that causes nutritional and respiratory complications in older hospitalized patients. Following hospital discharge, OD also causes hospital readmission and mortality in this population.

objectiveOur aim was to assess the effect of a minimal-massive intervention (MMI) in reducing nutritional and respiratory complications in older hospitalized patients with OD. DESIGN AND

participantsAn open label trial was performed on 186 hospitalized older patients (>70y) with OD; 62 of these patients with OD were treated with the MMI and paired by sex, age, functionality, comorbidities and body mass index with two controls.

interventionThe MMI consisted of: a) fluid thickening and texture-modified foods, b) caloric and protein supplementation; and c) oral health and hygiene recommendations during hospitalization and following discharge. The control group followed the standard clinical practice without MMI. MEASUREMENTS: Main study outcomes were hospital readmissions, respiratory infections, nutritional status and survival after 6 months follow up.

resultsBoth groups had similar advanced age (84.87±6.02MMI and 84.42±5.31 years), poor functionality (Barthel 59.51±26.76 MMI and 58.84±26.87), and high comorbidities (Charlson 3.00±1.60 MMI and 3.06±1.45). Main results showed that MMI improved nutritional status (MNA 9.84±2.05 pre-MMI vs. 11.31±2.21 post-MMI; p=0.0038) and functionality (Barthel 62.34±25.43 pre-MMI vs. 73.44±25.19 post-MMI; p=0.007). In addition MMI decreased hospital readmissions (68.8 readmissions/100 persons-year (28.1-109.38) MMI vs. 190.8 (156.0-225.7); p=0.001), respiratory infections (12.50 readmissions/100 persons-year (0-29.82) MMI vs. 74.68 (52.86-96.50); p=0.002), and increased 6-month survival (84.13% MMI vs. 70.96%; p=0.044).

conclusionsOur results suggest that a MMI in hospitalized older patients with OD improves nutritional status and functionality and reduces hospital readmissions, respiratory infections and mortality. MMI might become a new simple and cost-effective strategy to avoid OD complications in the geriatric population admitted with an acute disease to a general hospital.

Indexed as

Food, FormulatedAgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexDeglutition DisordersFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleNutritional StatusOral HealthPatient DischargePatient ReadmissionProof of Concept StudyViscosityageddeglutitiongeriatricsoral hygieneSwallowing disorders

Identifiers

PMID29806864
PMCPMC12876368
OpenAlexW2804880038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.