Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29806659›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018

The Value of Combining Plasma D-Dimer and Endothelin-1 Levels to Predict No-Reflow After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of ST-Segment Elevation in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients with a Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus History.

Ronghua Gao, Jianjun Wang, Shaohui Zhang, Guoliang Yang, Zhencai Gao, Xueying Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ronghua GaoDepartment of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, China (mainland).
Jianjun WangDepartment of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, China (mainland).
Shaohui ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, China (mainland).
Guoliang YangDepartment of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, China (mainland).
Zhencai GaoDepartment of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, China (mainland).
Xueying ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong, China (mainland).
Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND No-reflow phenomenon is a well-known problem, often accompanying percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEAMI). This study investigated the value of plasma D-dimer and Endothelin-1 (ET-1) levels on admission in predicting no-reflow after primary PCI and long-term prognosis in STEAMI patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIAL AND METHODS There were 822 patients with STEAMI and T2DM undergoing successful primary PCI included in this study: 418 patients showed normal re-flow after PCI, while 404 patients showed no-reflow phenomenon after PCI. The predictive value of plasma ET-1 and D-dimer level, and other clinical parameters for the no-reflow phenomenon were analyzed. RESULTS The high plasma ET-1 and D-dimer levels showed predictive value for the no-reflow phenomenon in STEAMI patients with T2DM. Patients with high D-dimer and ET-1 levels showed higher risk (4.212, with 95%CI of 2.973-5.967 and 2.447 with 95%CI of 1.723-3.476, respectively) of no-reflow phenomenon compared with patients with low plasma D-dimer and ET-1 levels. Sensitivity of high plasma ET-1 and D-dimer levels in predicting no-reflow was 0.766. Both plasma D-dimer and ET-1 were adverse prognosticators for STEAMI patients with a T2DM post PCI (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, plasma D-dimer and ET-1 levels on admission independently predict no-reflow after PCI in STEAMI patients with T2DM. When combined, the D-dimer and ET-1 levels as predictive and prognostic values are clinically promising. The plasma D-dimer and ET-1 levels provided a novel marker for treatment selection for the STEAIM patients with a T2DM history.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Endothelin-1FemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNo-Reflow PhenomenonPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPrognosisROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionEndothelin-1Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrin fragment D

Identifiers

PMID29806659
PMCPMC6003259
OpenAlexW2805765796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.