Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29806592›Full record

ArticleParasite (Paris, France)2018

Analysis of Dipylidium caninum tapeworms from dogs and cats, or their respective fleas - Part 1. Molecular characterization of Dipylidium caninum: genetic analysis supporting two distinct species adapted to dogs and cats.

Michel Labuschagne, Frédéric Beugnet, Steffen Rehbein, Jacques Guillot, Josephus Fourie, Dionne Crafford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasite (Paris, France), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hidden diversity of cestodes in wild African carnivores: I. Non-taeniid cyclophyllideans.International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Immunoassay for detection ofJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Severe ConcomitantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  15. NexGardParasite (Paris, France) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michel LabuschagneClinomics, P.O. Box 11186, Universitas, 9321, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Frédéric BeugnetBoehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, 29 Av Tony Garnier, 69007 Lyon, France.
Steffen RehbeinBoehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, Kathrinenhof Research Centre, Walchenseestr. 8-12, 83101 Rohrdorf, Germany.
Jacques GuillotÉcole Nationale Vétérinaire de Maisons-Alfort, 94704 Maisons-Alfort Cedex, France.
Josephus FourieClinvet, P.O. Box 11186, Universitas, 9321, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Dionne CraffordClinvet, P.O. Box 11186, Universitas, 9321, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A 28S rDNA PCR detection assay was previously developed to identify Dipylidium caninum DNA inside single fleas collected from both cats and dogs. Sequence analysis of the 28S rDNA fragment indicated two genetically distinct variations of the target region. The two genotypes, so-called "D. caninum canine genotype" and "D. caninum feline genotype", based on host origin, are further investigated and described in this paper. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and hydrolysis probe-based genotyping assays were developed and validated for genotyping D. caninum DNA. The complete mitochondrial (mt) genome of the "feline genotype" was sequenced and compared to the D. caninum mt genome available in GenBank. The molecular characterization of D. caninum isolates collected from infected fleas, and also proglottids collected from dogs and cats, confirmed the existence of two distinct genotypes. These genotypes are related to host origin (dogs or cats), irrespective of their geographical origin, and they present a biological adaptation to their respective host, as confirmed by the comparison of biological development and host preference in another study. The genetic differences (Part 1, present paper) and biological observations (Part 2, in this journal) enabled us to suggest the existence of two distinct species within D. caninum, which will have to be clarified.

Indexed as

AnimalsCat DiseasesCatsCestodaCestode InfectionsDNA, HelminthDNA, RibosomalDog DiseasesDogsFlea InfestationsGenetic VariationGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthSiphonapteraDNA, HelminthDNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID29806592
PMCPMC6013089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.