Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29806584›Full record

ArticleSICOT-J2018

Anthropometric measurements in Ponseti treated clubfeet.

Anil Agarwal, Anuj Rastogi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SICOT-J, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05456737 (Investigation of Ankle-Foot Characteristics, Balance, Funtional Activity and Quality of Life in Children With Idiopatic Pes Equinovarus), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05456737 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Investigation of Ankle-Foot Characteristics, Balance, Funtional Activity and Quality of Life in Children With Idiopatic Pes Equinovarus

TypeobservationalSponsorMedipol UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled51ConditionsClubfootArmsassessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anil AgarwalPediatric Orthopedic Surgeon, Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya, Geeta Colony, Delhi 31, India.
Anuj RastogiFellow, Indian Orthopaedic Association, Johari Medical Research Foundation (IOA- JMRF 2016), Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya, Geeta Colony, Delhi 31, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe measured the foot dimensions in the Ponseti treated idiopathic clubfeet to compare differences in foot sizes, if any. PATIENT AND

methodsThe foot length and width in unaffected, unilateral and bilateral clubfeet were measured and analysed statistically.

resultsAverage follow up was 22.2 months. Bilateral feet were similar in size. The unilateral affected feet matched in size with contralateral unaffected feet. The size difference between bilateral and unilateral affected feet was not significant. The bilateral feet were significantly smaller than age matched unaffected feet [in length 0.8 cm (6.1%); p = 0.03 and in width 0.2 cm, (3.7%); p = 0.03]. The unilateral foot was comparable with contralateral unaffected foot both during and post bracing.

conclusionsPost Ponseti treatment, inter bilateral, unilateral affected versus unaffected, bilateral versus unilateral affected feet matched in size. The overall clubfeet size especially those with bilateral disease were significantly shorter than unaffected side. The Ponseti managed unilateral foot size was comparable with unaffected foot during the bracing duration and size comparability was maintained even after bracing protocol of 3 years was over.

Identifiers

PMID29806584
PMCPMC5971664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.