ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2018
[Application of indocyanine green-based fluorescent angiography in autologous tissue breast reconstruction].
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Multivariable analysis for flap-related complications in autologous breast reconstruction and economic analysis of intraoperative indocyanine green angiography].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2020Article
- [Application progress of indocyanine green angiography in breast reconstruction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effect of indocyanine green (ICG)-based fluorescent angiography in autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Methods: Between June 2016 and June 2017, 14 female patients were treated with the autologous tissue breast reconstruction. The age ranged from 27 to 64 years with the median age of 46.5 years. There were 11 patients of one-stage reconstruction, including 9 with invasive ductal carcinoma of breast, 1 with recurrence tumor on chest wall, and 1 with angiosatcoma in the breast. The disease duration ranged from 9 days to 48 months (mean, 6.8 months). There were 3 patients of second-stage breast reconstruction, who underwent mastectomy 3-4 years ago. During operation, the first ICG-based fluorescent angiography was done before cutting off the flap pedicle. According to the results, 13 patients were adjusted the strategy of operation or cut part of flap, only 1 patient kept the original design. Then, the infusion of flaps were confirmed by the second ICG-based fluorescent angiography after transplanted to the recipient site. The area of flap ranged from 24 cm×11 cm to 36 cm×15 cm. All incisions of recipient site were closed by primary suture. Results: The fat liquefaction of incision occurred in 1 patient with type 2 diabetes, and the incision healed after debridement operation. The other flaps survived with no flap perfusion related complication. Both donor sites and recipient sites healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 1-14 months (mean, 4 months) with satisfied result of reconstruction. There was no tumor recurrence. Conclusion: ICG-based fluorescent angiography can reveal the perfusion of the flap in operation instantly and accurately. It should be very helpful to adjusting the strategy in reconstructive operation, especially in the large tissue demanded kinds such as breast reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.