ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2018
[Comparative study of different concentrations of methicillin-resistant
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the appropriate concentration of methicillin-resistant Methods: Forty-eight adult New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into 6 groups with 8 rabbits in each group. Animals in groups B, C, D, E, and F were injected 1×10 Results: Five rabbits died of severe infection in group B, 2 died in group C, and no rabbit died in groups D, E, and F. General observation showed that the incision healed without soft tissue swelling in group A; most animals had visible incision swelling and sinus formation, femoral thickening, bone destruction, and damage decreased with the decreasing of the concentration of liquid bacterial in groups B-D; the infection signs were seen in groups E and F, and the degree of infection were less than that of group D. Bacteriological examination showed that fistula formation animal in groups B, C, D, and E were cultured with positive results, and with the decrease of concentration, the number of animal fistula formation decreased gradually; and bacteriological culture did not be performed in group F because of no sinus formation. There was no significant difference in the content of C-reactive protein between groups before operation ( Conclusion: The optimal MRSA concentration of rabbit model of chronic osteomyelitis of femur is between 1×10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.