ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2017
[Feasibility of an injectable and
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancement of in vitro and in vivo bone repair performance of decalcified bone/gelma by desferrioxamine.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- [Effect of microfracture combined with biomimetic hydrogel scaffold on rotator cuff tendon-to-bone healing in rabbits].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To introduce an injectable and Methods: First, thiolated gelatin was prepared and the thiol content was determined by Ellman method, and then the injectable and Results: The thiol content in the thiolated gelatin was (0.51±0.03) mmol/g determined by Ellman method. The gelation time of the hydrogel was (6±1) minutes. DBM powder can be mixed with the hydrogel and injected into the implantation site within the gelation time. The cells in the DBM-Gel exhibited spreading morphology and connected each other in part with increasing culture time. The viability of the cells was 95.4%±1.9%, 97.3%±1.3%, and 96.1%±1.6% at 1, 3, and 7 days after culture, respectively. The relative proliferation was 1.0±0.0, 1.1±0.1, 1.5±0.1, and 1.6±0.1 at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days after culture respectively. Conclusion: The injectable and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.