Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29806054›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2019

Complications in patients with intramedullary nails: a case series from a single Cambodian surgical clinic.

Erik Woelber, Audrey Martin, Douglas Van Citters, Craig Luplow, Michael Githens, Charlotte Kohn, Yong Jun Kim, Heang Oy, Jim Gollogly

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Erik WoelberUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. woelber@ohsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4173-2860
Audrey MartinDartmouth Biomedical Engineering Center, Hanover, NH, USA.
Douglas Van CittersDartmouth Biomedical Engineering Center, Hanover, NH, USA.
Craig LuplowDuke University Department of Surgery, Durham, NC, USA.
Michael GithensUniversity of Washington Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seattle, WA, USA.
Charlotte KohnBrighton & Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Yong Jun KimChildren's Surgical Centre, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Heang OyChildren's Surgical Centre, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Jim GolloglyChildren's Surgical Centre, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Documentation Center of Cambodia · KHDartmouth College · USBrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBDuke University · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSince its development in 1999, the SIGN nail has been used in over 190,000 surgeries spanning 55 countries. To date, however, evaluation of SIGN nail outcomes has been limited to small prospective studies or large retrospective studies using SIGN's online database. This study uses the experience of a single, independent Cambodian surgical clinic to characterize common complications, provide commentary on ways to reduce the risk of those complications, and determine whether several observed nail fractures were due to metallurgic defects.

methodsClinic medical records were queried to identify complications in patients with SIGN nails. Data was abstracted including age, sex, mechanism of injury, and latency between injury, primary implantation, and presentation with a complication. Two nails that fractured in vivo were analyzed by light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and polarized light microscopy after chemical etching.

resultsFifty-four complications in 51 patients were identified. The most common complications were non-union (n = 26, 48%), infection (n = 16, 30%), flexion limitation (n = 11, 20%), nail fracture (n = 4, 7%), delayed union (n = 4, 7%), and malunion (n = 4, 7%). Other complications included broken or floating screws. Fractography revealed that two of the fractured nails most likely failed by fatigue followed by fast fracture at the site of non-union. We found no evidence of intrinsic nail defects. We identified multiple inconsistencies between SIGN's database and independent clinic records.

conclusionsNon-union and infection were common relative to all complications. Based on radiographic review, risk for non-union and malunion can be minimized by selecting an appropriate nail diameter, using multiple interlocking screws, and employing the correct implant and approach for fracture morphology when using SIGN nails. Nail fractures were unlikely to be caused by metallurgical flaws. Further study is necessary to determine the appropriate management of non-unions based on radiographic and clinical factors.

Indexed as

AdultBone NailsEquipment Failure AnalysisFemaleFemoral FracturesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHumansHumeral FracturesMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTibial FracturesYoung AdultNail fractureNon-unionSIGN nail

Identifiers

PMID29806054
OpenAlexW2807476082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.