Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29806027›Full record

ArticleScience advances2018

Blind prediction of noncanonical RNA structure at atomic accuracy.

Andrew M Watkins, Caleb Geniesse, Wipapat Kladwang, Paul Zakrevsky, Luc Jaeger, Rhiju Das

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. On the Completeness of Existing RNA Fragment Structures.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. FRET-guided modeling of nucleic acids.Nucleic acids research · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. RNA 3D Modeling with FARFAR2, Online.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. RNA Engineering for Public Health: Innovations in RNA-Based Diagnostics and Therapeutics.Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. IsRNA1:Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew M WatkinsDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1617-1720
Caleb GeniesseDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7897-8338
Wipapat KladwangDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Paul ZakrevskyDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Biomolecular Science and Engineering Program, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Luc JaegerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Biomolecular Science and Engineering Program, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9068-348X
Rhiju DasDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7497-0972

Funding

Molecular Biophysics Training Program at StanfordT32GM008294 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HUANG, KERWYN C. · 1989 to 2019
$7.4M
Next-generation computational/chemical methods for complex RNA structuresR35GM122579 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Rhiju Das · 2017 to 2026
$7.2M
Non-coding RNA Structure through a Mutate-and-Map StrategyR01GM102519 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DAS, RHIJU · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
Computational tools for understanding chemically modified RNA structure and interactionsR21CA219847 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DAS, RHIJU · 2017 to 2018
$334k
Correcting Pervasive Errors in RNA Crystallography with RosettaR21GM102716 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DAS, RHIJU · 2012 to 2013
$302k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA219847NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102519NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM102716NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122579NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction of RNA structure from nucleotide sequence remains an unsolved grand challenge of biochemistry and requires distinct concepts from protein structure prediction. Despite extensive algorithmic development in recent years, modeling of noncanonical base pairs of new RNA structural motifs has not been achieved in blind challenges. We report a stepwise Monte Carlo (SWM) method with a unique add-and-delete move set that enables predictions of noncanonical base pairs of complex RNA structures. A benchmark of 82 diverse motifs establishes the method's general ability to recover noncanonical pairs ab initio, including multistrand motifs that have been refractory to prior approaches. In a blind challenge, SWM models predicted nucleotide-resolution chemical mapping and compensatory mutagenesis experiments for three in vitro selected tetraloop/receptors with previously unsolved structures (C7.2, C7.10, and R1). As a final test, SWM blindly and correctly predicted all noncanonical pairs of a Zika virus double pseudoknot during a recent community-wide RNA-Puzzle. Stepwise structure formation, as encoded in the SWM method, enables modeling of noncanonical RNA structure in a variety of previously intractable problems.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationBase PairingNucleotide MotifsRNARNA

Identifiers

PMID29806027
PMCPMC5969821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.