ArticleJournal of transport & health2018
Child Pedestrian Street-Crossing Behaviors outside a Primary School: Developing Observational Methodologies and Data from a Case Study in Changsha, China.
Article in Journal of transport & health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Linking walkability and pedestrian crossing safety using simulated urban environments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Child pedestrian crossing behaviour and associated risk factors in school zones: a video-based observational study in Kampala, Uganda.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2024Observational
- An Examination of Child Pedestrian Rule Compliance at Crosswalks around Parks in Montreal, Canada.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Pedestrian-vehicle crashes: Risk perception and responsibility attribution among children, adolescents and adults.Journal of injury & violence research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChild pedestrian injury is a significant global public health challenge, and prevention programming requires an understanding of the context children face when crossing the street. Methods to understand children's behavior in real-world pedestrian settings are sparse in low- and middle-income countries.
methodsChildren in grades 1-6 were videotaped crossing a three-lane street outside their school in Changsha, China. Tapes were coded to collect: (1) extent of adult supervision, (2) whom children crossed the street with, and (3) safe behaviors exhibited by children.
resultsObservational videotape methods yielded data that could be reliably coded to understand Chinese children's behavior crossing the street outside their primary school. In total, we observed 216 child pedestrians crossing the street, including 105 girls, 105 boys, and 6 for whom gender could not be determined. 51% of observations occurred in the morning before school and 49% in the afternoon after school. Children encountered a busy and somewhat-chaotic traffic environment. Adults were always present to help, but children appeared to heed adult advice concerning the crossing only about 70% of the time. Fewer than 1/3 of children looked at oncoming traffic before they entered a lane and over 1/3 entered a lane with moving traffic approaching.
conclusionObservational methods of coding videotaped behavior proved effective to understand and code children's risk and safety while crossing the street outside their primary school. At the street environment we studied, we found that children's pedestrian behavior involved significant risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.