Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29805958›Full record

ArticleCurrent clinical microbiology reports2018

Rotavirus vaccines: why continued investment in research is necessary.

Michelle M Arnold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current clinical microbiology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michelle M ArnoldDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Molecular and Tumor Virology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA.

Funding

COBRE Center for Molecular and Tumor VirologyP30GM110703 · NIGMS · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV HSC SHREVEPORT · PI SAPP, MARTIN · 2014 to 2018
$4.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM110703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRotavirus vaccines were first introduced more than a decade ago and have had a tremendous impact on reducing the number of hospitalizations and deaths due to rotavirus-associated diarrhea. This review will discuss current rotavirus vaccines, post-licensure surveillance, progress in non-replicating vaccine development, and why continued research is important for understanding a virus that remains a globally leading cause of death due to diarrhea. RECENT

findingsResearch advances have enhanced our understanding of how vaccines induce protection against subsequent severe disease, how the virus replicates and spreads in the face of the host immune system, and basic mechanisms governing the viral life cycle. SUMMARY: Much remains to be learned about how to improve vaccine success, what are the molecular determinants of host range and virulence, and what are the interactions of the virus with the host that drive its replicative success, among many other important questions.

Indexed as

immune responserotavirusvaccine

Identifiers

PMID29805958
PMCPMC5967271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.