Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29805956›Full record

ArticleCurrent transplantation reports2018

Social Media in the Identification of Living Kidney Donors: Platforms, Tools, and Strategies.

Macey L Henderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current transplantation reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Financial toxicity in living donor liver transplantation: A call to action for financial neutrality.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Kidney health for all: bridging the gap in kidney health education and literacy.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Insights From Transplant Professionals on the Use of Social Media: Implications and Responsibilities.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Macey L HendersonJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

Technological Innovations for Live Kidney Donor Follow-up Care ManagementK01DK114388 · NIDDK · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LEVAN, MACEY LEIGH · 2017 to 2021
$720k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK114388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewLiving donor transplantation offers patients with end-stage renal disease faster access to transplant and better survival and quality of life than waiting for a deceased donor or remaining on dialysis. While many people state they would be willing to help someone in need through kidney donation, there are education and communication barriers to donor candidate identification. These barriers might be mitigated by technological innovations, including the use of social media. RECENT

findingsThis article describes the state of contemporary evidence regarding use of social media tools and interventions to increase access to living donor transplantation, as reported in peer-reviewed medical literature, as well as programs that have not yet been formally evaluated. SUMMARY: As social media platforms continue to grow and expand, a commitment to understanding and facilitating the use of social media by the transplant community may support patients who are interested in using social media as a tool to find a living kidney donor.

Indexed as

digital healthinternetliving donor transplantationLiving organ donationsocial media

Identifiers

PMID29805956
PMCPMC5963285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.