ArticleCureus2018
Portal Annular Pancreas: Case Report of a Rare Anomaly.
Article in Cureus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenges and outcomes of pancreato-duodenectomy in portal annular pancreas: A single center experience with a systematic review of the literature.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2025Article
- Management of Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer in a Patient With Annular Portal Pancreas: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for circumportal pancreas: literature review and report of two type IIIA cases.Surgical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Portal annular pancreas is a rare congenital anomaly in which the portal vein and/or the splenoportal confluence are completely encircled by aberrant pancreatic parenchyma. It is an asymptomatic condition and is usually an incidental finding. It is, however, important to a surgeon because the postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rates following pancreatic resection are higher in patients with this anomaly. A 47-year-old male presented with features of obstructive jaundice. He was diagnosed to have periampullary carcinoma, and pancreatoduodenectomy was planned. During surgery, uncinate process was seen extending posterior to the portal vein and was communicating with the body of pancreas to the left of the portal vein. After transection, there were two pancreatic stumps. The pancreatic duct was identified in the stump anterior to the portal vein. No duct was present in the posterior pancreatic stump. We closed the posterior pancreatic stump with interrupted polypropylene sutures and performed a duct to mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy in the anterior stump. On reviewing the preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan, we were able to identify the pancreatic tissue encasing the portal vein superior to the splenic vein. Circumportal pancreas is classified based on the orientation of pancreatic duct to the portal vein and the relationship of the aberrant pancreatic tissue with the splenoportal confluence. Following pancreatoduodenectomy, the surgeon has to manage two pancreatic stumps, one anterior and the other posterior to the portal vein. No standardised technique has been described for management of the pancreatic stumps. Every surgeon planning pancreatic surgery should be aware of this rare anomaly, and look for the same in the preoperative CT scan so that appropriate plan can be made regarding the type of pancreatic anastomosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.