Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29805806›Full record

ReviewMinimally invasive surgery2018

3D Printing Applications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.

Megan R Hsu, Meraaj S Haleem, Wellington Hsu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Minimally invasive surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03786432 (A Prospective Clinical Pilot Study Of Fusion Rates Using Spira™-C Titanium 3-D Printed Interbody Device For Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03786432 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Clinical Pilot Study Of Fusion Rates Using Spira™-C Titanium 3-D Printed Interbody Device For Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion

TypeinterventionalSponsorCorewell Health EastRan2019 to 2022Enrolled13ConditionsCervical Radiculopathy, Cervical Disc DiseaseArmsSpira-C Interbody Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Multimodality Imaging for 3D Printing and Surgical Rehearsal in Complex Spine Surgery.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Recent advances of 3D-printing in spine surgery.Surgical neurology international · 2024
    Review
  11. Research relating to three-dimensional (3D) printing in spine surgery: a bibliometric analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Three-Dimensional Printing in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2019
    Review
  16. 3D printing in spine surgery.Annals of translational medicine · 2019
    Review
  17. Current status of 3D printing in spine surgery.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Megan R HsuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Beaumont Hospital Research Institute, 3811 West 13 Mile Road, Suite #404, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA.
Meraaj S HaleemDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 Saint Clair St. Suite #1350, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4322-5544
Wellington HsuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 Saint Clair St. Suite #1350, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9086-6868

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D printing (3DP) technology continues to gain popularity among medical specialties as a useful tool to improve patient care. The field of spine surgery is one discipline that has utilized this; however, information regarding the use of 3DP in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) is limited. 3D printing is currently being utilized in spine surgery to create biomodels, hardware templates and guides, and implants. Minimally invasive spine surgeons have begun to adopt 3DP technology, specifically with the use of biomodeling to optimize preoperative planning. Factors limiting widespread adoption of 3DP include increased time, cost, and the limited range of diagnoses in which 3DP has thus far been utilized. 3DP technology has become a valuable tool utilized by spine surgeons, and there are limitless directions in which this technology can be applied to minimally invasive spine surgery.

Identifiers

PMID29805806
PMCPMC5899854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.