Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29805684›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2018

Multi-modality imaging features distinguish pancreatic carcinoma from mass-forming chronic pancreatitis of the pancreatic head.

Zhibing Ruan, Jun Jiao, Dingyu Min, Jinhuan Qu, Jing Li, Jing Chen, Qi Li, Chunhong Wang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mass-forming pancreatitis versus pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: CT and MR imaging for differentiation.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2020
    Review
  16. Advanced imaging techniques for chronic pancreatitis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhibing RuanDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550004, P.R. China.
Jun JiaoDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550004, P.R. China.
Dingyu MinDepartment of Medical Records and Statistics, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou 550002, P.R. China.
Jinhuan QuDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550004, P.R. China.
Jing LiDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550004, P.R. China.
Jing ChenDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550004, P.R. China.
Qi LiDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550004, P.R. China.
Chunhong WangDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550004, P.R. China.
Guiyang Medical University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University · CNGuizhou Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study retrospectively analyzed computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography-computerized tomography (PET/CT) data to identify features that may distinguish pancreatic carcinoma (PC) from mass-forming chronic pancreatitis (MFCP) of the pancreatic head. The mean diameter of the lesions was larger in the MFCP patients (n=24) than in the PC patients (n=30; 5.44±27 vs. 3.34±1.23 cm; P<0.001). PC lesions showed increased lobulation when compared with the MFCP cases (83.33 vs. 12.5%; P<0.001). Lesions in the MFCP patients exhibited diffuse and marginally distributed calcification. MFCP patients showed increased exudation around the lesion (83.33 vs. 13.33%), pseudocyst formation (58.33 vs. 10%) and thickening of the right renal fascia (83.33 vs. 13.33%) than in the PC patients. MFCP patients also exhibited visible remnants of normal pancreatic tissue within the lesions. MFCP and PC patients could be distinguished by a cutoff value of 4.40 cm for lesion size [area under the curve (AUC): 0.894; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.810-0.978)], 21.85 Hu for net-increased value in the arterial phase (AUC, 0.799; 95% CI, 0.670-0.928), 37.70 Hu for net-increased value in the portal phase (AUC, 0.798; 95% CI, 0.919-0.677), 4.85 for early standardized uptake value (SUV) of

Indexed as

differential diagnosismass-forming chronic pancreatitismulti-modality imagingpancreatic head carcinomapancreatic head mass

Identifiers

PMID29805684
PMCPMC5958642
OpenAlexW2800692122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.