ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2018
Contribution of susceptibility- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for grading gliomas.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of ADC derived from DWI for differentiating high-grade from low-grade gliomas: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Investigating the potential of segmented echo-planar imaging-based susceptibility-weighted imaging for glioma grading.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Automated intertumoral susceptibility signal extraction combined with quantitative enhanced TQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Utility of Intratumoral Susceptibility Signals in Adult Diffuse Gliomas: Tumor Grade Prediction and Correlation with Molecular Markers Within the WHO CNS5 (2021) Classification.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Automated ITSS extraction combined with R2* values obtained from enhanced T2*-weighted angiography in magnetic resonance imaging: a promising approach for differentiate cervical adenocarcinoma from squamous carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- An update on susceptibility-weighted imaging in brain gliomas.European radiology · 2024Review
- Intravoxel incoherent motion and enhanced T2*-weighted angiography for preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Advanced multiparametric MRI-based scoring for isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation prediction of gliomas.Polish journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Role of susceptibility-weighted imaging and intratumoral susceptibility signals in grading and differentiating pediatric brain tumors at 1.5 T: a preliminary study.Neuroradiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess the value of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the grading of gliomas and to evaluate the correlation between these quantitative parameters derived from SWI and DWI. A total of 49 patients with glioma were assessed by DWI and SWI. The evaluation included the ratio of apparent diffuse coefficient values between the solid portion of tumors and contralateral normal white matter (rADC) and the degree of intratumoral susceptibility signal intensity (ITSS) within tumors. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses were performed and the area under the ROC curve was calculated to compare the diagnostic performance, determine optimum thresholds for tumor grading, and calculate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for identifying high-grade gliomas. The correlation between DWI- and SWI-derived parameters was also evaluated. The rADC and the degrees of ITSS within tumors were significantly higher in high-grade gliomas than those in low-grade gliomas. ROC curve analysis indicated that the rADC was a better index for grading gliomas than the ITSS degree. Statistical analysis demonstrated a threshold value of 1.497 for rADC to provide a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 86.2, 85.0, 89.3 and 81.0%, respectively, for determining high-grade gliomas. A degree of ITSS of 1.5 was defined as the threshold to identify high-grade gliomas and sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 82.8, 75.0, 82.8 and 75.0% were obtained, respectively. Furthermore, a moderate inverse correlation between rADC and the ITSS degree was revealed. Combination of SWI with DWI may provide valuable information for glioma grading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.