Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29805383›Full record

ArticleDementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra

Efficacy and Safety of MLC601 in Patients with Mild to Moderate Alzheimer Disease: An Extension 4-Year Follow-Up Study.

Hossein Pakdaman, Koroush Gharagozli, Mehdi Abbasi, Ali Sobhanian, Ali Bakhshandehpour, Farzad Ashrafi, Mitra Khalilzad, Ali Amini Harandi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hossein PakdamanBrain Mapping Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Koroush GharagozliBrain Mapping Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi AbbasiBrain Mapping Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali SobhanianBrain Mapping Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali BakhshandehpourHealth and Human Physiology School, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Farzad AshrafiBrain Mapping Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mitra KhalilzadBrain Mapping Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali Amini HarandiBrain Mapping Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimAlzheimer disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia. Currently, there is no disease-modifying therapy for AD. We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of MLC601 in the treatment of AD.

methodsIn this open-label extension study, patients with mild to moderate AD according to DSM-IV criteria were recruited. Patients received MLC601 capsules 3 times a day for 4 years. Cognitive function was assessed every 6 months using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) scores. Safety profiles, including adverse events (AEs), and treatment-related abnormality in laboratory tests were also reported.

resultsOf a total of 122 patients, 105 completed the study. The mean age was 66.8 ± 6.3 years at the beginning of the study. Sixty-five (61.9%) were female. The mean (±SD) change in MMSE and ADAS-Cog scores at the end of the study was 2.1 (±3.8) and -5.1 (±8.7), respectively. Repeated measure analysis revealed a statistically significant change in both scores (

conclusionThe efficacy of treating AD patients with MLC601 over 4 years has been demonstrated in the present study. Overall, it seems that the safety and efficacy of MLC601 is promising compared to currently prescribed treatments.

Indexed as

Alzheimer diseaseFollow-up studyMLC601Safety

Identifiers

PMID29805383
PMCPMC5968230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.