ArticleTrends in plant science2018
Unbuttoning the Ancestral Flower of Angiosperms.
Article in Trends in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pollination syndromes and the origins of floral traits.Annals of botany · 2023Review
- Model Species to Investigate the Origin of Flowers.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Expression and Functional Studies of Leaf, Floral, and Fruit Developmental Genes in Non-model Species.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Evolution and diversity of the angiosperm anther: trends in function and development.Plant reproduction · 2021Review
- Developmental stochasticity and variation in floral phyllotaxis.Journal of plant research · 2021Review
- Developmental Flower and Rhizome Morphology inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A recent study using an extensive data set plus sophisticated analytical tools reconstructed a model of the ancestral angiosperm flower. Although attractive, it presents problems of homology assessment. We discuss its inconsistencies and endorse the use of a comparative model that integrates biological parameters as essential to elucidate floral evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29804718What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.