Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29804672›Full record

ArticleMethods in cell biology2018

Living Xenopus oocytes, eggs, and embryos as models for cell division.

Ani Varjabedian, Angela Kita, William Bement

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in cell biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ani VarjabedianLaboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Graduate Program in Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Angela KitaGraduate Program in Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
William BementLaboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Graduate Program in Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States; Department of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States. Electronic address: wmbement@wisc.edu.

Funding

Transient cytoskeletal arraysR01GM052932 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BEMENT, WILLIAM · 1997 to 2023
$7.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM052932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenopus laevis has long been a popular model for studies of development and, based on the use of cell-free extracts derived from its eggs, as a model for reconstitution of cell cycle regulation and other basic cellular processes. However, work over the last several years has shown that intact Xenopus eggs and embryos are also powerful models for visualization and characterization of cell cycle-regulated cytoskeletal dynamics. These findings were something of a surprise, given that the relatively low opacity of Xenopus eggs and embryos was assumed to make them poor subjects for live-cell imaging. In fact, however, the high tolerance for light exposure, the development of new imaging approaches, new probes for cytoskeletal components and cytoskeletal regulators, and the ease of microinjection make the Xenopus oocytes, eggs, and embryos one of the most useful live-cell imaging models among the vertebrates. In this review, we describe the basics of using X. laevis as a model organism for studying cell division and outline experimental approaches for imaging cytoskeletal components in vivo in X. laevis embryos and eggs.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionModels, BiologicalAnimalsCollagenasesCytological TechniquesEmbryo, NonmammalianMicroinjectionsMorpholinosOocytesOvulationOvumPlasmidsPolyadenylationProgesteroneRNATranscription, GeneticCollagenasesMorpholinosProgesteroneRNAActin filamentsCytokinesisCytoskeletonEmbryoMicroscopyRho GTPasesSpindleXenopus

Identifiers

PMID29804672
PMCPMC6050073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.