Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29804280›Full record

Observational studyHeart and vessels2018

Clinical significance of discrepant mid-wall late gadolinium enhancement in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Shoichi Ehara, Kenji Matsumoto, Ryoko Kitada, Satoshi Nishimura, Kenei Shimada, Minoru Yoshiyama

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Heart and vessels, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance for predicting left ventricular reverse remodeling in dilated cardiomyopathy: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Novel impact of metal ion-induced cell death on diabetic cardiomyopathy pathogenesis and therapy.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shoichi EharaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan. ehara@med.osaka-cu.ac.jp.
Kenji MatsumotoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Ryoko KitadaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Satoshi NishimuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Kenei ShimadaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Minoru YoshiyamaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A drawback of visual assessment for late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the subjectivity and reproducibility of the results. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling in response to optimal pharmacotherapies and the definite or discrepant mid-wall LGE with visual assessment in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). A total of 65 patients who had been hospitalized with newly diagnosed DCM and had undergone CMR, were enrolled. When the visual assessment of the presence or absence of mid-wall LGE was confirmed by the two observers, patients were classified into either the positive- (n = 20) or negative-LGE (n = 29) groups. If there was discordance between the diagnoses of the two observers, patients were classified into the discrepant-LGE (n = 16) group. LV reverse remodeling was defined as an increase in LV ejection fraction by at least 10% concomitant with a decrease in the LV end-diastolic dimension by at least 10%. Among the three groups, the frequency of early LV reverse remodeling within a 1-year follow-up was significantly different (p = 0.0068). The frequency of LV reverse remodeling within a 1-year follow-up was 59, 31, and 15%, and over 2 years was 83, 62, and 40%, in patients with negative-, discrepant-LGE, and positive-LGE, respectively. The survival rate for composite end-points of cardiovascular mortality, sustained ventricular tachycardia, appropriate cardioverter-defibrillator discharge, or rehospitalization for decompensated heart failure was lower in positive-LGEs than in negative-LGEs (p =0.0011), whereas, there were no significant differences between both negative- and discrepant-LGEs, and discrepant- and positive-LGEs. This study showed that the discordance for LGE visual assessment occupied an intermediate position between positive and negative for LGE in LV reverse remodeling in patients with DCM.

Indexed as

Ventricular RemodelingCardiomyopathy, DilatedContrast MediaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGadolinium DTPAHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsStroke VolumeTime FactorsContrast MediaGadolinium DTPACardiac magnetic resonance imagingDilated cardiomyopathyFibrosisLate gadolinium enhancementVentricular remodeling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.