ArticleNeuroradiology2018
Is deep brain involvement in intracranial primary central nervous system lymphoma of importance for penetration of chemotherapeutic agents?
Article in Neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cranial Radiation Therapy as Salvage in the Treatment of Relapsed Primary CNS Lymphoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Sex-Specific Differences in Primary CNS Lymphoma.Cancers · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purposes of this study are to study the impact of deep brain involvement on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in intracranial primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL), and to explore possible mechanisms for this impact using advanced MRI techniques.
methodsSeventy-nine patients with histologically verified PCNSL were identified from a prospective clinical database of patients treated at Oslo University Hospital between 2003 and 2014. Patients were treated per standard chemotherapeutic regimens (N = 57) or no chemotherapy (N = 22). Anatomical MRIs were available in all patients to assess tumor load and location based on contrast agent enhancement visible on T1-weighted images. Diffusion MRIs were available in 33 (42%) patients and perfusion MRI in 13 (16%) patients that received active treatment.
resultsAcross all patients, OS and PFS were 16.4 and 9.8 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, MRI-based deep brain involvement (80%) was the only negative significant factor of OS (OR = 14.2; P < 0.005). While a reduced Karnofsky performance status was associated with deep brain involvement (P < 0.05), neither chemotherapy regimen, neurologic status, nor patient age were independent significant factors for OS or PFS in this setting. Compared to other tumors and healthy tissue levels, MRI perfusion showed more pathologic hemodynamic flow signatures in tumors with deep brain involvement.
conclusionIn intracranial PCNSL, the only significant prognostic factor for OS and PFS in multivariate analysis was age and deep brain involvement. While contingent on a small study sample, we hypothesize this may in part be explained by regional differences in vascular supply and delivery from a dysfunctional perfusion signature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.