Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29804065›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Variation in minimum desired cardiovascular disease-free longevity benefit from statin and antihypertensive medications: a cross-sectional study of patient and primary care physician perspectives.

Nicole E M Jaspers, Frank L J Visseren, Mattijs E Numans, Yvo M Smulders, Fere A van Loenen Martinet, Yolanda van der Graaf, Jannick A N Dorresteijn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Longevity.Clinical medicine & research · 2026
    Review
  5. Impact of implementing Dutch versus European guideline risk factor targets in older patients with ischaemic heart disease.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicole E M JaspersDepartment of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Frank L J VisserenDepartment of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mattijs E NumansDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Yvo M SmuldersDepartment of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fere A van Loenen MartinetRandwijck Primary Care Medical Center, Amstelveen, The Netherlands.
Yolanda van der GraafJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jannick A N DorresteijnDepartment of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExpressing therapy benefit from a lifetime perspective, instead of only a 10-year perspective, is both more intuitive and of growing importance in doctor-patient communication. In cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention, lifetime estimates are increasingly accessible via online decision tools. However, it is unclear what gain in life expectancy is considered meaningful by those who would use the estimates in clinical practice. We therefore quantified lifetime and 10-year benefit thresholds at which physicians and patients perceive statin and antihypertensive therapy as meaningful, and compared the thresholds with clinically attainable benefit.

designCross-sectional study. SETTINGS: (1) continuing medical education conference in December 2016 for primary care physicians;(2) information session in April 2017 for patients.

participants400 primary care physicians and 523 patients in the Netherlands. OUTCOME: Months gain of CVD-free life expectancy at which lifelong statin therapy is perceived as meaningful, and months gain at which 10 years of statin and antihypertensive therapy is perceived as meaningful. Physicians were framed as users for lifelong and prescribers for 10-year therapy.

resultsMeaningful benefit was reported as median (IQR). Meaningful lifetime statin benefit was 24 months (IQR 23-36) in physicians (as users) and 42 months (IQR 12-42) in patients willing to consider therapy. Meaningful 10-year statin benefit was 12 months (IQR 10-12) for prescribing (physicians) and 14 months (IQR 10-14) for using (patients). Meaningful 10-year antihypertensive benefit was 12 months (IQR 8-12) for prescribing (physicians) and 14 months (IQR 10-14) for using (patients). Women desired greater benefit than men. Age, CVD status and co-medication had minimal effects on outcomes.

conclusionBoth physicians and patients report a large variation in meaningful longevity benefit. Desired benefit differs between physicians and patients and exceeds what is clinically attainable. Clinicians should recognise these discrepancies when prescribing therapy and implement individualised medicine and shared decision-making. Decision tools could provide information on realistic therapy benefit.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLongevityMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Risk AssessmentRisk FactorsAntihypertensive AgentsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorsdoctor-patient communicationindividualized preventionpreventive medicineprimary careshared decision makingvascular medicine

Identifiers

PMID29804065
PMCPMC5988148

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.