Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29803987›Full record

ReviewAmerican heart journal2018

Rationale and design of the British Heart Foundation (BHF) Coronary Microvascular Angina (CorMicA) stratified medicine clinical trial.

Thomas J Ford, David Corcoran, Keith G Oldroyd, Margaret McEntegart, Paul Rocchiccioli, Stuart Watkins, Katriona Brooksbank, Sandosh Padmanabhan, Naveed Sattar, Andrew Briggs and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American heart journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03193294 (CORonary MICrovascular Angina), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03193294 nacompletednot on this map

CORonary MICrovascular Angina (CorMicA): a Randomised, Controlled, Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNHS National Waiting Times Centre BoardRan2016 to 2019Enrolled151ConditionsAngina, Stable, Coronary Vasospasm, Coronary Circulation, Coronary SyndromeArmsStratified medicine involving a diagnostic intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Clinical aspects of ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA).American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024
    Article
  6. Prognostic value of structural and functional coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease; from the multicentre international ILIAS registry.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Thomas J FordWest of Scotland Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom; British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom; University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
David CorcoranBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Keith G OldroydWest of Scotland Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom; British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Margaret McEntegartWest of Scotland Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom; British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Paul RocchiccioliWest of Scotland Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom; British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Stuart WatkinsWest of Scotland Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Katriona BrooksbankBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Sandosh PadmanabhanBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Naveed SattarBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Andrew BriggsCentre for Population and Health Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Alex McConnachieRobertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Rhian TouyzBritish Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Colin BerryWest of Scotland Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom; British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom. Electronic address: colin.berry@glasgow.ac.uk.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/14/15/30661British Heart Foundation PG/17/25/32884Medical Research Council MR/N003403/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronary angiography is performed to assess for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), but "nonobstructive CAD" is a common finding. Microvascular or vasospastic angina may be relevant, but routine confirmatory testing is not evidence based and thus rarely performed.

aimThe aim was to assess the effect of stratified medicine guided by coronary function testing on the diagnosis, treatment, and well-being of patients with angina and nonobstructive CAD.

designThe BHF CorMicA trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, blinded, sham-controlled trial of stratified medicine (NCT03193294). All-comers referred for elective coronary angiography for investigation of suspected CAD will be screened. Following informed consent, eligible patients with angina and nonobstructive CAD will be randomized 1:1 immediately in the catheter laboratory to either coronary artery function-guided diagnosis and treatment (intervention group) or not (control group). Coronary function will be assessed using a pressure-temperature-sensitive guidewire and adenosine followed by pharmacological testing with intracoronary acetylcholine. Patients will be stratified into endotypes with linked therapy. The primary outcome is change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire score at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include safety, feasibility, diagnostic utility (impact on diagnosis and diagnostic certainty), and clinical utility (impact on treatment and investigations). Health status is a key secondary outcome assessed according to the following domains: quality of life, treatment satisfaction, illness perception, physical activity, and anxiety-depression score. Patients with obstructive disease who are not randomized will form a registry group who will be followed up as a comparator for secondary outcomes including health status. Health and economic outcomes will be evaluated in the longer term using electronic health record linkage. VALUE: CorMicA is a proof-of-concept clinical trial of a disruptive stratified intervention with potential benefits to patients and health care providers.

Indexed as

CardiologyRegistriesSocieties, MedicalClinical Trials as TopicCoronary AngiographyHumansMicrovascular AnginaQuality of LifeUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID29803987
PMCPMC6018570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.