ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2018
The MRItab: A MR-compatible touchscreen with video-display.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A tutorial on capturing mental representations through drawing and crowd-sourced scoring.Behavior research methods · 2022Article
- Tablet Technology for Writing and Drawing during Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Protracted Neural Development of Dorsal Motor Systems During Handwriting and the Relation to Early Literacy Skills.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Visual experiences during letter production contribute to the development of the neural systems supporting letter perception.Developmental science · 2020Article
- Ecological validity of experimental set-up affects parietal involvement during letter production.Neuroscience letters · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA touchscreen interface permits rich user interactions for research in many fields, but is rarely found within a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) environment due to difficulties adapting conventional technologies to the strong electromagnetic fields. Conventional MR-compatible video display technology uses either large-screen displays that are placed outside of the bore of the MRI itself, or projectors located beyond the participant's reach, making touch interfaces impossible. NEW
methodHere, we describe the MR-compatibility of the 'MRItab' in terms of MR safety and image quality. The MRItab adapts inexpensive off-the-shelf components with special signal-driver circuitry and shielding to bring the touchscreen interface into the MR environment, without adversely affecting MRI image quality, thereby making touch interfaces possible.
resultsOur testing demonstrated that the functioning of the MRItab was not affected by the functioning of the MRI scanner and that the MRItab did not adversely affect the image data acquired. Participants were able to interact naturally with the MRItab during MRI scanning. COMPARISON WITH OTHER METHOD (S): The MRItab is the first MR-compatible touchscreen device with video-display screen capabilities designed for use in the MRI environment. This interactive digital device is the first to allow participants to see their hands directly as they interact with a touch-sensitive display screen, resulting in high ecological validity.
conclusionsThe MRItab provides a methodological advantage for research in many fields, given the realistic human-computer interaction it supports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.