Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29803839›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology2018

Risk of Neoplastic Progression in Individuals at High Risk for Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Long-term Surveillance.

Marcia Irene Canto, Jose Alejandro Almario, Richard D Schulick, Charles J Yeo, Alison Klein, Amanda Blackford, Eun Ji Shin, Abanti Sanyal, Gayane Yenokyan, Anne Marie Lennon and 6 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 207 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
207citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
14.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05006131 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Pancreatic Cancer Screening for At-risk Individuals (The Pancreas Scan Study)

TypeobservationalSponsorBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRan2020 to 2032Enrolled1,395ConditionsPancreatic Cancer, AdultArmsScreening for pancreatic cancer
NCT06330441 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Pancreatic Cancer Screening in a Population at High Risk

TypeinterventionalSponsorMasaryk Memorial Cancer InstituteRan2022 to 2028Enrolled700ConditionsPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Hereditary Diseases, Pancreatitis, ChronicArmsendoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance, laboratory examination
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

207 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 394 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Alterations in the Duodenal Fluid Microbiome of Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

147 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marcia Irene CantoDepartment of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: mcanto@jhmi.edu.
Jose Alejandro AlmarioDepartment of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Richard D SchulickDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado.
Charles J YeoDepartment of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Alison KleinDepartment of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Amanda BlackfordDepartment of Oncology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Eun Ji ShinDepartment of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abanti SanyalThe Johns Hopkins Biostatistics Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Gayane YenokyanThe Johns Hopkins Biostatistics Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Anne Marie LennonDepartment of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ihab R KamelDepartment of Radiology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Elliot K FishmanDepartment of Radiology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Christopher WolfgangDepartment of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Matthew WeissDepartment of Surgery, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Ralph H HrubanDepartment of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Michael GogginsDepartment of Medicine (Gastroenterology), The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Pathology, The Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Tumor Antigens for Individual Signatures and TherapyP50CA062924 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LENNON, ANNE MARIE · 1993 to 2022
$54.6M
Translational Research Enhancement CoreP30DK089502 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ZACHOS, NICHOLAS CONSTANTINE · 2011 to 2020
$12.0M
Using markers to improve pancreatic cancer screening and surveillance: a multi-center studyU01CA210170 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Michael G. Goggins · 2016 to 2026
$9.3M
Validation and Fine-Scale Mapping of Pancreatic Cancer Susceptibility Loci (Study)R01CA154823 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KLEIN, ALISON P · 2011 to 2020
$5.7M
Validation and extension of the PREMM Model for mismatch repair gene mutationsR01CA132829 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI SYNGAL, SAPNA · 2008 to 2022
$5.6M
Using Markers to Improve Pancreatic Cancer ScreeningR01CA176828 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GOGGINS, MICHAEL G. · 2013 to 2024
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA062924NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132829NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154823NCI NIH HHS R01 CA176828NCI NIH HHS U01 CA210170NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK089502
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsScreening of individuals who have a high risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), because of genetic factors, frequently leads to identification of pancreatic lesions. We investigated the incidence of PDAC and risk factors for neoplastic progression in individuals at high risk for PDAC enrolled in a long-term screening study.

methodsWe analyzed data from 354 individuals at high risk for PDAC (based on genetic factors of family history), enrolled in Cancer of the Pancreas Screening cohort studies at tertiary care academic centers from 1998 through 2014 (median follow-up time, 5.6 years). All subjects were evaluated at study entry (baseline) by endoscopic ultrasonography and underwent surveillance with endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or computed tomography. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of PDAC, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3, or intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) after baseline. We performed multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

resultsDuring the follow-up period, pancreatic lesions with worrisome features (solid mass, multiple cysts, cyst size > 3 cm, thickened/enhancing walls, mural nodule, dilated main pancreatic duct > 5 mm, or abrupt change in duct caliber) or rapid cyst growth (>4 mm/year) were detected in 68 patients (19%). Overall, 24 of 354 patients (7%) had neoplastic progression (14 PDACs and 10 HGDs) over a 16-year period; the rate of progression was 1.6%/year, and 93% had detectable lesions with worrisome features before diagnosis of the PDAC or HGD. Nine of the 10 PDACs detected during routine surveillance were resectable; a significantly higher proportion of patients with resectable PDACs survived 3 years (85%) compared with the 4 subjects with symptomatic, unresectable PDACs (25%), which developed outside surveillance (log rank P < .0001). Neoplastic progression occurred at a median age of 67 years; the median time from baseline screening until PDAC diagnosis was 4.8 years (interquartile range, 1.6-6.9 years).

conclusionsIn a long-term (16-year) follow-up study of individuals at high-risk for PDAC, we found most PDACs detected during surveillance (9/10) to be resectable, and 85% of these patients survived for 3 years. We identified radiologic features associated with neoplastic progression.

Indexed as

Sentinel SurveillanceAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDisease ProgressionEarly Detection of CancerEndosonographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateLongitudinal StudiesMagnetic Resonance ImagingEarly DetectionFamilial Pancreatic CancerIPMNPanIN-3

Identifiers

PMID29803839
PMCPMC6120797
OpenAlexW2803439891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.